Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shilpi RaiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The Court held that the application may be withdrawn upon permission and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Shilpi Rai, the wife of the late Ajay Rai, filed an application before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and Gopal Rai. The petitioner was represented by Advocate Mr. Anand Kumar Ojha, while the State was represented by APP Mrs. Pronoti Singh. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner sought the Court's permission to withdraw the pending application. The Court, after hearing the arguments, granted the request for withdrawal. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw the application with the Court's permission

Subjects

  • withdrawal of application
  • court permission
  • procedural law

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22832 of 2025
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2025 Thana- BUXAR MUFFSIL District- Buxar
                  ======================================================
                  Shilpi Rai Wife of Late Ajay Rai Resident of Village - Kritpura, P.S. - Buxar
                  (M), District- Buxar. At- Present Resident of Village - Kanheri, P.S. - Rajpur,
                  District - Buxar

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
            1.    The State of Bihar
            2.    Gopal Rai @ Mritunjay Rai Son of Late GauriShankar Rai Resident of
                  Village - Kritpura, P.S. - Buxar (M), District- Buxar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Anand Kumar Ojha, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :      Mrs. Pronoti Singh, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                        ORAL ORDER

3    12-01-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                    APP for the State.

                                 2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the

                    petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as

                    withdrawn.


                                               (Soni Shrivastava, J)

Trivedi/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.