Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Gouri DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The petitioners are entitled to bail subject to the conditions imposed by the court.

Summary

Gouri Devi and Parwati Devi were arrested in connection with a dowry death alleged under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the BNS. They applied for bail, contending that the FIR was false, delayed, and lacked specific allegations of assault or dowry demand. The State opposed the bail. The court examined the petitioners' clean antecedent, the alleged procedural lapses in the FIR, and the seriousness of the charge. Considering the arguments, the court granted bail to each petitioner on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of cooperation, presence in court, non‑tampering with evidence, and verification of criminal antecedents. The order directed that the bail bond not be delayed for verification purposes.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in a dowry death case under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the BNS.
  • Whether the FIR is false and materially defective to warrant bail.
  • Whether the petitioners' clean antecedent and the delay in filing the FIR justify bail.

Legislation cited

  • BNS — s. 3(5), 80

Subjects

  • bail
  • dowry death
  • false FIR
  • criminal antecedent
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22882 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-121 Year-2024 Thana- AKBARNAGAR District- Bhagalpur
                 ======================================================
           1.     Gouri Devi W/o Rakesh Das @ Rakesh Kumar Das
           2.    Parwati Devi W/o Shankar Das
                 Both R/o Village - Akbarnagar, P.S - Akbarnagar, District - Bhagalpur

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Pankaj Kumar Sinha, Advocate
                                          :      Mr.Rounak Kumar Singh Pankaj, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Ms.Suman Kumari Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   08-04-2026                   Heard Mr.Pankaj Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for

                   the petitioners and Ms.Suman Kumari Singh,                             learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                 2. The petitioners seek bail, who are in custody since

                   02.01.2026 in connection with Akbarnagar P.S. Case No. 121 of

                   2024, F.I.R. dated 27.10.2024 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Sections 80, 3(5) of BNS.

                                 3. Allegation against the petitioners is that they

                   alongwith other co-accused persons have in furtherance of their

                   common intention committed the dowry death of the daughter

                   of the informant.

                                 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners

                   submits that the petitioners have clean antecedent. The
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22882 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026
                                            2/3




          allegation as alleged in the FIR is false and fabricated and the

          petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged in the

          FIR. From a bare perusal of the FIR it appears that the date of

          occurrence as alleged in the FIR is 23.10.2024 but the present

          FIR has been instituted on 27.10.2024 after delay of three days

          without giving any explanation of delay afterthought only to

          falsely implicate the petitioners. Further submits that from a

          bare perusal of the FIR it appears that there is no specific

          allegation of any assault, overt-act or demand of dowry

          attributed against the petitioners and the husband of the

          deceased, namely, Santosh Kumar, who happens to be the son of

          petitioner No.2, is in judicial custody since 02.01.2026 and the

          police, after investigation, submitted chargesheet against the

          petitioners and the petitioners are in custody since 02.01.2026.

                         5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioners,

          above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of

          Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand)each with two sureties of the like

          amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-1st,

          Bhagalpur in connection with Akbarnagar P.S. Case No. 121 of

          2024, with the following conditions:-
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22882 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026
                                                           3/3




                                      (I) Petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

                         properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court

                         and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and

                         on theri absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

                         reason, their bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                                      (II) If the petitioners tamper with the evidence or the

                         witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move

                         for cancellation of bail.

                                      (III) And, further condition that the court below shall

                         verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case at

                         any stage, it is found that the petitioners have concealed their

                         criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for

                         cancellation of bail bond of the petitioners. However, the

                         acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                         shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                         verification.



                                                (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Nitesh/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.