Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rambha DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted bail to both petitioners, finding that the procedural deficiencies and lack of direct possession justified release on bond.

Summary

Rambha Devi and Manish Kumar were arrested in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of large quantities of illicit country‑made liquor. The petitioners contended that the liquor was not recovered from their possession and that the police had failed to comply with Section 105 of the BNSS while making the seizure, asserting that they were falsely implicated. They had been in judicial custody since 20‑11‑2025 and sought bail, while the State opposed bail on the ground of a criminal antecedent of petitioner no. 2. After hearing both sides, the Court found merit in the petitioners’ arguments and decided to enlarge bail. The bail was ordered on the condition of a Rs 10,000 bond each, with two sureties, to be satisfied before the Exclusive Special Excise Court No. 1, East Champaran.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act considering alleged procedural lapses in seizure.
  • Whether the existence of a prior criminal case against one petitioner justifies denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • prohibition and excise
  • illicit liquor
  • procedural lapse
  • Section 30(a)
  • Section 105
  • criminal antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22944 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-659 Year-2025 Thana- MOTIHARI MUFASIL District- East
                                                       Champaran
                 ======================================================
           1.     Rambha Devi W/O Late Bam Manjhi R/O Village- Bharauniya, Musahari
                  Tola, P.S.- Muffasil, Distt.- East Champaran.
           2.    Manish Kumar S/O Late Bani Manjhi @ Benilal Manjhi R/O Village-
                 Bharauniya, Musahari Tola, P.S.- Muffasil, Distt.- East Champaran.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Harsha Shashwat, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Zainul Abedin, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   07-04-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioners have prayed for bail in connection

                   with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 659 of 2025 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise

                   Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that 145 liters

                   of illicit country-made liquor were recovered from the house of

                   petitioner no. 2 and 250 liters of country-made liquor were

                   recovered from the house of petitioner no. 1.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have

                   committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22944 of 2026(2) dt.07-04-2026
                                                      2/2




                    case. He also submits that nothing has been recovered from the

                    possession of the petitioner. The witnesses of the seizure list are

                    police personnel and the police has not complied with Section 105

                    of the BNSS while making the seizure. He further submits that the

                    petitioners are languishing in judicial custody since 20.11.2025.

                                 5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                    for the State and submits that petitioner no. 2 is having criminal

                    antecedent of one case whereas petitioner no. 1 has no criminal

                    antecedent.

                                 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                    considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                    inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail.         The above named

                    petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                    bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two

                    sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                    Exclusive Special Excise Court No.1, Civil Court, East

                    Champaran at Motihari in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No.

                    659 of 2025.


                                                   (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.