Patna High Court
Govind Giri @ Baidhnath Giri @ Vidhanand PuriversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- REJECTED
- Bench
- RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
Holding
The Court refused bail, holding that the seriousness of the allegations and supporting medical evidence preclude the petitioner’s release.
Summary
The petitioner, Govind Giri, was arrested on 13 November 2025 in connection with FIR No. 366/2025 alleging assault on the mother of an informant, resulting in her death. The FIR listed multiple offences under the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, later amended to include Section 103(1). The petitioner pleaded for bail, claiming a clean record and that the allegations were fabricated due to political rivalry, with no specific act attributed to him. The State opposed bail, citing the FIR’s specific allegation of assault and supporting medical evidence of the victim’s injuries. The Court, after considering the seriousness of the charges and the medical proof, refused the bail application, concluding that the petitioner should remain in custody.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the serious nature of the offences alleged in the FIR.
- Whether the allegations against the petitioner constitute a specific and cognizable offence justifying denial of bail.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023 — s. 103(1), 109(1), 115(2), 118(1), 126(2), 303(2), 3(5), 351(3), 352
Subjects
- bail
- assault
- homicide
- FIR
- medical evidence
- political rivalry
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23061 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-366 Year-2025 Thana- DHANAHA District- West Champaran
======================================================
Govind Giri @ Baidhnath Giri @ Vidhanand Puri S/o- Brijraj Giri R/v-
Chhitauna Tola PS- Dhanaha Dist- West Champaran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bakshi S.R.P. Sinha, Sr.Advocate
: Mr.Shahbaj Alam, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Ms.Veena Kumari Jaiswal, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
ORAL ORDER
4 03-07-2026 Heard Mr.Bakshi S.R.P. Sinha, learned senior
counsel for the petitioner, who has appeared through virtual
mode, learned counsel for the informant and Ms.Veena Kumari
Jaiswal, learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since
13.11.2025 in connection with Dhanaha P.S. Case No. 366 of
2025, F.I.R. dated 12.11.2025 registered for the offence
punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 352,
351(3), 303(2), 3(5) of BNS, 2023 but later on amended Section
103(1) has been added.
3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he assaulted
to the mother of the informant, namely, Guma Devi by means of
Bakua causing head injury due to which she died in course of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23061 of 2026(4) dt.03-07-2026
2/3
treatment.
4. Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner
submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent. The allegation
as alleged in the FIR is false and fabricated and the petitioner
has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. From a
bare perusal of the FIR it appears that due to some political
rivalry the present occurrence has taken place. There is case and
counter case and there is no specific allegation of any assault or
overt-act attributed against the petitioner rather there is general
and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons including
the petitioner.
5. Learned counsel for the informant and learned APP
for the State, on the other hand, have vehemently opposed the
prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that from a bare
perusal of the FIR it appears that there is direct and specific
allegation against the petitioner that he has assaulted to the
mother of the informant and she has died during her treatment.
6. Considering the nature of allegation against the
petitioner in the FIR supported by the medical evidence, I am
not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with
Dhanaha P.S. Case No. 366 of 2025 pending in the court of
learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Bagaha, West Champaran.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23061 of 2026(4) dt.03-07-2026
3/3
7. Prayer is refused.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Nitesh/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.