Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Vikash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court ordered that the petitioners be released on bail subject to a bond of Rs 10,000 and two sureties each.

Summary

The petitioners, Vikash Kumar, Sudhir Kumar Singh and Jitendra Kumar, were charged under Sections 30(a), 32 and 36 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged seizure of 244.40 litres of illicit foreign liquor from a car. They contended that the liquor was recovered from a different vehicle, that they were merely employed as liners, and that the police failed to comply with Section 105 of the BNSS while making the seizure. The petitioners also highlighted their clean criminal record and that they had been in judicial custody since 9 March 2026. The State opposed the bail application, arguing the seriousness of the offence. After hearing both sides, the Court granted bail to each petitioner on a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties of the same amount, directing compliance with the Exclusive Special Judge (Excise‑I), Kishanganj.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioners are entitled to bail despite the alleged involvement in the seizure of illicit liquor under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
  • Whether the police complied with Section 105 of the BNSS in effecting the seizure, affecting the validity of the charges.
  • Whether the petitioners' lack of criminal antecedent and custodial status justify the grant of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise
  • illicit liquor
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Section 105
  • police seizure
  • special case

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                            CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23077 of 2026
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-144 Year-2026 Thana- BAHADURGANJ District- Kishanganj
                 ======================================================
           1.     Vikash Kumar son of Brahamdev Singh @ Bhramdev Singh Resident of
                  Village- Sripur PS -Naugachia District -Bhagalpur
           2.    Sudhir Kumar Singh son of Bindeshwar Singh @ Bindeshwari Singh
                 Resident of Village- Sripur PS -Naugachia District -Bhagalpur
           3.     Jitendra Kumar son of Patho Thakur Resident of Village- Sripur PS
                  -Naugachia District -Bhagalpur
                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                    ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s         :     Mr. Shivanand Singh, Advocate
                                                    Mr. Andiib Imrose, Advocate
                                                    Ms. Amisha Prakash, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s     :     Mr. Bishweshwar Ram, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                                ORAL ORDER

2   08-04-2026                Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   APP for the State.

                              2. The petitioners have prayed for bail in connection

                   with Special Case No.90 of 2026 arising out of Bahadurganj P.S.

                   Case No.144 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under

                   Sections 30(a), 32 & 36 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                              3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from a

                   car altogether 244.40 liters of illicit foreign liquor was recovered.

                              4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioners has submitted that nothing has been recovered from the

                   possession of these petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners

                   has further submitted that the recovery has been made from other
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23077 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026
                                                        2/2




                      car. It has further been submitted that the petitioners have been

                      framed in this case only on the ground that they were working as

                      liner. Learned counsel for the petitioners has further submitted that

                      the witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel and police

                      have not complied Section 105 of the BNSS while making seizure.

                      It has further been submitted that the petitioners are having no

                      criminal antecedent and they are in judicial custody since

                      09.03.2026.

                                   5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                      for the State.

                                   6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                      considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                      inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named

                      petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                      bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two

                      sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of

                      learned Exclusive Special Judge (Excise-I), Kishanganj in

                      connection with Special Case No.90 of 2026 arising out of

                      Bahadurganj P.S. Case No.144 of 2026.



                                            (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
durgesh/-
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.