Patna High Court
SURAJ KUMAR @ SURAJ KUMAR SINHAversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
The petition to quash the FIR is dismissed as it has become infructuous after cognizance and charge‑sheet filing.
Summary
The petitioners, four brothers from Nuruddinganj, filed a petition in 2019 seeking to quash FIR No. 175 of 2018 registered at Sitamarhi Police Station. The petition was filed before the charge-sheet was filed and cognizance taken. During the hearing on 29‑01‑2026, counsel for the petitioners argued that the case had progressed, with cognizance now taken after the charge‑sheet submission. The Court held that because the investigation had moved to the stage of filing a charge‑sheet, the petition to quash the FIR had become infructuous. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition, but allowed the petitioners to raise any grounds at a later appropriate stage.
Issues considered
- Whether a petition to quash an FIR remains maintainable after cognizance has been taken and a charge‑sheet filed
Subjects
- quash FIR
- cognizance
- charge‑sheet
- infructuous application
- criminal procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23191 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-175 Year-2018 Thana- SITAMARHI District- Sitamarhi
======================================================
1. SURAJ KUMAR @ SURAJ KUMAR SINHA Son of Shatish Prasad Sinha
Residence of Village -Nuruddinganj, P.S-Malsalami, District-Patna.
2. Shailendra Kumar Sinha Son of Late Shatish Prasad Sinha Residence of
Village -Nuruddinganj, P.S-Malsalami, District-Patna.
3. Bijay Kumar Sinha Son of Late Tarkeshwar Prasad Sinha Residence of
Village -Nuruddinganj, P.S-Malsalami, District-Patna.
4. Sumit Sinha Son of Brajkishore Prasad Residence of Village -Nuruddinganj,
P.S-Malsalami, District-Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Brij Bihari Tiwary
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rabindra Kumar
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 29-01-2026 Heard the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
since he has approached this Court in the year 2019 for
quashing the FIR bearing Sitamarhi P.S. Case No. 175 of 2018
but now the stage has changed as cognizance has been taken
after submission of charge-sheet.
3. In view of the above, this application has become
infructuous now and accordingly, the same is dismissed as
having become infructuous with liberty to the petitioners to
raise all the grounds at an appropriate stage.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-
U
Checking your session…