Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Surendra DasversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Surendra Das was arrested along with another individual after police intercepted a motorcycle allegedly carrying 745 grams of charas-like contraband from the Nepal border. He was charged under Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act. The petitioner contended that he had no conscious possession, that the seizure was recorded jointly with the co‑accused, that the seizure did not comply with Section 105 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, and that the quantity, though above the small‑quantity threshold, was far below commercial quantity. He also highlighted his lack of prior criminal record. The State opposed bail. Considering the procedural lapses, the modest quantity and the petitioner’s clean record, the Court granted regular bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted in an NDNDPS case where the alleged quantity exceeds the small‑quantity limit but is less than commercial quantity.
  • Whether non‑compliance with Section 105 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act during seizure warrants bail.
  • Whether the petitioner’s lack of conscious possession and clean antecedent justify bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • charas
  • seizure procedure
  • Section 105
  • quantity thresholds
  • criminal antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23311 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-145 Year-2025 Thana- Haraiya District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Surendra Das S/o Nathuni Das Resident of Village - Tumariya Tola, Ward No.
                 4, P.S - Haraiya, District -East Champaran


                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Narcotics Control Bureau (N.C.B), Bihar, Patna Bihar


                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   16-04-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for grant of regular bail

                   in connection with a case registered for the offences punishable

                   under Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that the

                   police received secret information that two persons riding a

                   motorcycle were coming from the Nepal side carrying

                   contraband. Acting upon such information, the said motorcycle

                   was intercepted and two persons were apprehended, who were

                   identified as the petitioner and one Vishal Kumar. It is further

                   alleged that a total of 745 grams of charas-like contraband was
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23311 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026
                                            2/3




          recovered from the leg guard of the motorcycle.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the

          present case. It is contended that no recovery has been made

          from the conscious possession of the petitioner. From perusal of

          the seizure list, it appears that the alleged recovery has been

          shown jointly from two persons, namely the petitioner and one

          Vishal Kumar. It is further submitted that the witnesses to the

          seizure list are police personnel, and the mandatory provisions

          of Section 105 of the BNSS have not been complied with during

          the seizure. It is also argued that although the alleged recovery

          is more than small quantity, it is much less than commercial

          quantity. The petitioner is in custody since 19.11.2025 and has

          no criminal antecedent.

                       5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer

          for bail.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on

          bail. Accordingly, the above-named petitioner is directed to be

          released on bail in connection with Haraiya P.S. Case No. 145 of

          2025, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten

          Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23311 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026
                                                        3/3




                      satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge/Special Judge, East

                      Champaran, Motihari.



                                             (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Jagdish/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.