Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Chhotu Alam @ Chhote MiyaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner subject to specified conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Chhotu Alam, was arrested in connection with a case involving the recovery of two loaded pistols, cartridges, a motorcycle and a knife, and was charged under IPC sections 399, 402 and 414 and Arms Act sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35. He contended that he was not named in the FIR and was implicated only through the confessional statements of co‑accused Krishna Kumar and Sunny Kumar, with no material recovered from his possession. The State opposed his bail, citing the seriousness of the offences. The Court examined the lack of direct evidence against the petitioner and his claim of innocence, and considered the statutory provisions governing bail. It ordered his release on bail of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions regarding cooperation with the trial, surety affiliation, disclosure of future accusations, and prohibition against tampering with evidence or witnesses.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the serious nature of the offences under the IPC and Arms Act.
  • Whether the confessional statements of co‑accused are sufficient to justify continued detention of the petitioner.
  • Whether the absence of material evidence directly linking the petitioner to the recovered weapons warrants bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Indian Penal Code
  • Arms Act
  • confessional statements
  • false implication
  • conditions of bail
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23340 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-169 Year-2023 Thana- ADAPUR District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Chhotu Alam @ Chhote Miya S/o Jal Mohammad @ Jala Miya @ Jal
                 Mahamad Miya R/o Vill- Shyampur Chowk, P.S.- Adapur, Distt- East
                 Champaran

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Kumar Vikram, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh-1, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   08-04-2026                      Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Adapur P.S. Case No. 169 of 2023 dated 04.06.2023

                   registered for the offence punishable under Sections 399,

                   402 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-

                   b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

                                3. The allegation is of recovery of two loaded

                   country made pistol, two live cartridges, one Splendor

                   Motorcycle and one knife from the possession of the co-

                   accused persons.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23340 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026
                                            2/3




          the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in

          this case. It is submitted that the petitioner is not named in

          the F.I.R., rather, he has been made accused, only on the

          basis of confessional statement of Krishna Kumar and

          Sunny Kumar, who were apprehended at the time of

          occurrence. It is further submitted that five persons were

          arrested at the time of raid from the orchard of Pravin Singh

          and some illegal arms were recovered from the apprehended

          persons. Further, it is submitted that nothing has been

          recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner.

          There is no materials against the petitioner in the case dairy

          to connect him with the said crime. The petitioner is in

          custody since 22.11.2025, having one criminal case against

          him and charge-sheet has been submitted in the case.

                       5. Learned A.P.P for the State opposes the prayer

          for bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Having considered the facts and circumstances

          of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the

          parties, let the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing

          bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties

          of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23340 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026
                                                        3/3




                      S.D.J.M., Raxaul at Mothihari in connection with Adapur

                      P.S. Case No. 169 of 2023, subject to the following

                      conditions:-

                                              1. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and
                                      shall be properly represented on each and every
                                      date fixed by the Court and on his absence on two
                                      consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail
                                      bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                                              2. One of the bailors will be his own blood
                                      relation, preferably father, mother, brother, sister
                                      and or his wife.

                                              3. The bailor shall also state on affidavit that
                                      he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner
                                      is made accused in any other case of similar nature
                                      after his release in the present case and thereafter
                                      the court below will be at liberty to initiate the
                                      proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of
                                      misuse.

                                              4. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence
                                      or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will
                                      be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.



                                                   (Khatim Reza, J)
prabhat/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.