Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Raj Kumar Singh @ Abhinesh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court allowed the bail application, directing the petitioner to be released on bail with conditions.

Summary

Petitioner Raj Kumar Singh was arrested in connection with a case alleging that he inflicted a knife blow on the aunt of an informant, Sonam Patel. He faced charges under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109, 74 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The petitioner claimed innocence, argued that the injury was simple rather than grievous, and highlighted a hostile relationship with the informant and a prior FIR against the informant. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offences and the petitioner’s earlier alleged criminal act. After considering the record, the court granted regular bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions not to tamper with evidence or commit further offences. The bail application was allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail despite the nature of the alleged injuries and the seriousness of the offences under the B.N.S.
  • Whether the alleged simple nature of the injury and the informant's hostility affect the bail decision
  • Whether the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedent precludes the grant of bail

Legislation cited

  • B.N.S. — s. 109, 115(2), 118(2), 126(2), 3(5), 74

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • criminal procedure
  • injury classification
  • B.N.S.
  • bond
  • surety
  • Bihar High Court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23498 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-273 Year-2025 Thana- KOILWAR District- Bhojpur
                 ======================================================
                 Raj Kumar Singh @ Abhinesh Singh S/o Late Chandra Mani Singh @ Late
                 Chandramani Singh Resident of village- Kulhariya, P.S - Koilwar, District -
                 Bhojpur

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Arvind Kumar Pradhan, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey, APP.
                 For the Informant/s      :       Mr. Shantanu Kumar Singh, Adv.
                                                  Mr. Madhav Kumar Jha, Adv.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   07-05-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

                   counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has preferred this application for

                   grant of regular bail in connection with Koilwar P.S. Case No.

                   273 of 2025 dated 25.11.2025 registered for the offences

                   punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109, 74 and

                   3(5) of B.N.S.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is

                   alleged to have inflicted knife blow upon the aunt of the

                   informant, namely, Sonam Patel.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23498 of 2026(3) dt.07-05-2026
                                            2/3




          case. It is submitted that there is an error of record in the

          impugned order when it has been mentioned that the injuries

          received by the aunt of the informant is grievous in nature rather

          the injury report which was called for by this Court by order

          dated 08.04.2026 would go to show that the injury is simple in

          nature. It has been submitted that there is no allegation of

          repetition of blow. It has further been submitted that the

          informant is on an inimical term with the petitioner and earlier

          also an FIR was lodged against him. It has lastly been submitted

          that petitioner is in custody since 19.12.2025 and has got one

          criminal antecedent which was lodged by the prosecution side

          itself.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for

          the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of

          the petitioner and learned counsel for the informant has

          submitted that petitioner on earlier occasion had also indulged

          himself into criminal act against the prosecution party.

                       6. Heard the parties and perused the record.

                       7. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of

          the case, the petitioner above-named is directed to be enlarged

          on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten

          Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23498 of 2026(3) dt.07-05-2026
                                                       3/3




                     satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Bhojpur, Ara in

                     connection with Koilwar P.S. Case No. 273 of 2025.

                                  (i) It is directed that the petitioners will not tamper

                     with the evidence and indulge into any sort of criminal activity

                     with the informant’s side and if the petitioner gets himself

                     involved subsequently in similar nature of offence, the

                     prosecution would be at liberty to file appropriate application

                     for cancellation of bail bonds.

                                  8. The application stands allowed.



                                                (Praveen Kumar, J)
shivam/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.