Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

CHUMAN YADAVversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court allowed the anticipatory bail application, granting bail subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

Summary

The petitioner, Chuman Yadav, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a criminal case (PS Case No. 384 of 2025) alleging his participation in an unlawful assembly that assaulted an informant and her son, resulting in injuries. The prosecution charged him under multiple sections of the B.N.S., including offences relating to unlawful assembly, assault, and attempt to murder. The petitioner contended that he was merely a bystander, falsely implicated due to a prior dispute, and had no criminal antecedents. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seriousness of the offences. After hearing both sides, the court granted anticipatory bail subject to a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail despite the serious nature of the charges under the B.N.S.
  • Whether the petitioner was a participant in the alleged unlawful assembly or merely a bystander
  • Whether the allegations disclose sufficient ground for arrest warrant

Legislation cited

  • B.N.S. — s. 109(1), 115(2), 118(1), 126(2), 190, 191(2), 303(2), 329(3), 351(3), 352, 79
  • B.N.S.S. — s. 482(2)

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • unlawful assembly
  • assault
  • false implication
  • bail conditions
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23546 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-384 Year-2025 Thana- DHANAHA District- West Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 CHUMAN YADAV Son of Lalbabu Yadav Resident of Village - Khotahawa,
                 Ward No.- 13, Police Station - Dhanaha, District - West Champaran

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Sanobar Shahnaz, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Manoj Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   22-04-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case in

                   connection with Dhanaha P.S. Case No. 384 of 2025 dated

                   25.11.2025 registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 191(2), 190, 329(3), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1),

                   352, 351(3), 79 and 303(2) of the B.N.S.

                                3. As per the allegation, this petitioner along with

                   several co-accused persons forming an unlawful assembly came

                   at the door steps of the informant and started assaulting the

                   informant and her son, namely, Nitish Patel as a result of which

                   both of them got injuries on head and hand. Thereafter, it is

                   alleged that this petitioner assaulted by means of lathi on the

                   head of the son of the informant.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23546 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026
                                            2/3




                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

          that the petitioner has been made accused on the backdrop of

          previous dispute and the petitioner was never a part of the

          unlawful assembly. Moreover, it has been submitted that the

          injuries sustained by the son of the informant is simple in nature

          which fact has been mentioned in paragraph-9 of the

          anticipatory bail application, there is no allegation of repetition

          of blow against the petitioner and in fact he fell down on the

          ground and received injuries as a result of scuffle with the co-

          accused persons. It has further been submitted that the petitioner

          was present at the alleged place of occurrence as a bystander

          and thinking the petitioner to be the associate of the co-accused

          persons, the informant got this petitioner falsely implicated. The

          petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Heard the parties and perused the record, let the

          above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender

          within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on

          anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/-

          (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each

          to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Bagaha, West
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23546 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026
                                                       3/3




                     Champaran in connection with Dhanaha P.S. Case No. 384 of

                     2025, subject to conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of

                     the B.N.S.S.

                                  7. The application stands allowed.



                                                (Praveen Kumar, J)
shivam/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.