Patna High Court
Praveen @ Pravir DasversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
The Court held that the petitioner had full knowledge of the illicit liquor being transported, and therefore regular bail could not be granted.
Summary
The petitioner, Praveen @ Pravir Das, was arrested as the driver of a mini‑truck from which 4,844.655 litres of foreign liquor were seized. He was charged under Sections 281, 125, 338, 336(3), 340(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 30(a), 41 and 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He applied for regular bail, claiming he had no knowledge of the contraband. The State opposed the bail, arguing the liquor was not concealed and therefore the driver must have known about it. The Court examined the facts, concluded that the lack of concealment indicated the petitioner’s full knowledge of the illicit liquor, and consequently refused regular bail, allowing a fresh application if the trial is delayed. The order is limited to the bail application and does not prejudice the merits of the trial.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail despite the seizure of illicit liquor from his vehicle.
- Whether the absence of concealment of the contraband demonstrates the petitioner's knowledge sufficient to deny bail.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — s. 125, 281, 336(3), 338, 340(2)
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act — s. 30(a), 41, 47
Subjects
- bail
- illicit liquor
- knowledge
- transport of contraband
- criminal procedure
- prohibition law
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23589 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-28 Year-2026 Thana- Roshna District- Katihar
======================================================
Praveen @ Pravir Das S/o Late Sripati Das R/o - Manglibari, Ward No.9, P.S -
Old Malda, District - Malda (West Bengal)
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nagendra Prasad
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
5 29-04-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with
Roshna P.S. Case No. 28 of 2026 registered for the offence
under Sections 281, 125, 338, 336(3), 340(2) of the Bharatiya
Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 30(a), 41 and 47 of the Bihar
Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, 4844.655 liters of
foreign liquor have been recovered from the mini truck being
driven by the petitioner.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence.
Petitioner is in custody since 06.02.2026. It is further submitted
that the petitioner is the driver of the vehicle and he had no
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23589 of 2026(5) dt.29-04-2026
2/2
knowledge about the consignment.
5. Learned counsel for the State vehemently opposes
the bail application.
6. I have considered the submissions of the parties and
have gone through the records of the case. The consignment of
illicit liquor was recovered from the truck being driven by the
petitioner. It was not concealed with any other goods which
were to be transported meaning thereby that the petitioner had
full knowledge about the illicit liquor being transported by him.
7. In view of the above, this Court is not inclined to
grant regular bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this application
for regular bail stands rejected. If the trial is delayed by the
prosecution, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.
8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is
prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of
adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations
shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case
and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any
manner.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.