Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kamlesh Kumar @ Kamlesh PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court grants anticipatory bail to the petitioners subject to conditions, as the liquor was not recovered from their possession.

Summary

Kamlesh Kumar and Birendra Paswan were implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for allegedly manufacturing and selling illicit country-made liquor. A search near a pond recovered 100 litres of liquor, but none was found in the accused's physical possession. The petitioners claimed they were falsely implicated due to local politics and sought anticipatory bail. The State opposed the bail. The High Court, noting the absence of direct possession and the recovery from an open place, granted anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, subject to bond and surety conditions and cooperation with the investigation.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail is appropriate when the alleged contraband is not recovered from the accused's possession.
  • Whether the provisions of Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 preclude grant of anticipatory bail.
  • Application of Section 438(2) CrPC and Section 482(2) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in granting anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • illegal liquor
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23602 of 2026
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-564 Year-2025 Thana- PAKRIDAYAL District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
           1.     Kamlesh Kumar @ Kamlesh Paswan S/o Ramjanam Paswan Resident of
                  village- Dhanauji ward no 04, P.s.- Pakaridayal, District- East Champaran at
                  motihari
           2.    Birendra Paswan S/o Late Ramshish Paswan Resident of village- Dhanauji
                 ward no 04, P.s.- Pakaridayal, District- East Champaran at motihari

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Dilip Kumar Roy
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Syed Ehteshamuddin
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   16-04-2026                        Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the

                   Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 in connection with

                   Pakaridayal P.S.Case No. 564 of 2025.

                                3. As per allegation, the petitioners were engaged in

                   illegal manufacturing and selling of country-made liquor near a

                   pond, situated at Dhanauji Sareh. In presence of two

                   independent witnesses, search was conducted and 100 litres of

                   illicit country-made liquor was recovered from near the said

                   pond.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23602 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026
                                            2/3




                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

          petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the

          present case on account of dirty village politice and nothing

          incriminating articles have been recovered from the conscious

          physical possession of the petitioners.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

          anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

                       6. Considering the fact that the petitioners were not

          apprehended on the spot and no recovery of liquor has been

          made from the conscious physical possession of the petitioners,

          and also it appears that the liquor has been recovered from an

          open place from a plastic sack from the bank of the pond, which

          cannot be attributed to the petitioners and, therefore,       I am

          inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to both the

          petitioners.

                       7. Let the petitioners, as named above, in the event of

          their arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, be

          enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees

          Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each

          to the satisfaction learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No. 3,

          East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Pakaridayal

          P.S.Case No. 564 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23602 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026
                                                       3/3




                     under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section

                     482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and

                     subject to further condition that :-

                                  (i) the petitioners shall co-operate in the investigation/

                     trial.

                                  (ii) the learned court would, however, verify the

                     criminal antecedents of the petitioners and in case it is found

                     that the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedents,

                     the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of

                     the petitioners. However, it is expected that the verification

                     process would be done expeditiously without causing any delay.



                                              (Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
HR/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.