Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ravindra Kumar @ Chotu PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

Bail was denied as the accused is deemed a drug peddler and the offence is serious.

Summary

The petitioner, Ravindra Kumar Paswan, was arrested on 26 January 2026 in connection with a case registered under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, where police recovered 160 packets of ‘smack’ suggesting he was a drug peddler. He applied for bail before the Patna High Court. The prosecution argued that the large quantity of narcotics indicated a serious offence and a risk of tampering with evidence. Justice Sandeep Kumar, after hearing counsel, held that the seriousness of the alleged offence and the substantial seizure warranted denial of bail. The bail application was dismissed, with a direction that the petitioner could re‑apply if the trial is unduly delayed. The order was limited to the bail application and did not prejudice the merits of the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Sections 8(c) and 21(b) of the NDPS Act given the large seizure of narcotics.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • drug peddling
  • high court
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23606 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-54 Year-2026 Thana- NAUBATPUR District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Ravindra Kumar @ Chotu Paswan Son of Devnandan Paswan Resident of
                 Village - Ajwa, P.S. - Naubatpur, Dist. - Patna.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Nazia Shabah, Advocate
                 For the State            :       Mr.Sanjay Kumar Sharma, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   15-04-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Naubatpur P.S. Case No. 54 of 2026 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Sections 8(c), 21(b) of the Narcotics Drugs

                   and Psychotropic Substance Act.

                                 3. As per the prosecution case, there is recovery of

                   160 packet of smack in small packets which indicates that the

                   petitioner is a drug peddler.

                                 4. The petitioner is in custody since 26.01.2026.

                                 5. Considering the huge recovery and also the fact that

                   the petitioner appears to be a drug peddler, I am not inclined to

                   grant bail to the petitioner.

                                 6. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed for
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23606 of 2026(2) dt.15-04-2026
                                                       2/2




                     the present.

                                  7. If the trial is delayed by the persecution, the

                     petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.

                                  8. It is, however, clarified that the observations made

                     herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail

                     application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at

                     any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not express

                     any opinion on the merits of the case.


                                                                          (Sandeep Kumar, J)

P. Kumar

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.