Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Binod UraoversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The court denied bail, holding that the magnitude of the narcotics seizure justifies denial of regular bail.

Summary

The petitioner, Binod Urao, was arrested on 20 May 2025 after a police raid recovered 160 kg of ganja from a maize field in Araria. He is charged under Sections 8 and 20(b)(ii)(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. The petitioner applied for regular bail, claiming he was a laborer hired for a petty sum and was unaware that the sacks contained ganja. The State opposed the bail, emphasizing the large quantity of narcotics involved. The Patna High Court, considering the seriousness of the offence and the massive recovery, dismissed the bail application and directed the trial court to expedite the trial, while clarifying that the order does not prejudice the merits of the case.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to an accused under the NDPS Act when a large quantity of narcotics (160 kg) has been seized
  • Whether the petitioner’s claim of ignorance and low‑level involvement warrants regular bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • drug trafficking
  • large quantity seizure
  • presumption of guilt
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23610 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2025 Thana- GHURNA District- Araria
                 ======================================================
                 Binod Urao son of Basudeo Urao Resident Of Village -Bewanganj, Ward No.
                 03, Ps And District -Sunsari, Nepal

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :        Mr.Kumar Ravish, Advocate
                 For the State           :        Mr.Dilip Kumar No. 1, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   15-04-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Ghurna

                   P.S. Case No. 35 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable

                   under Sections 8, 20(b)(ii)(c) of the Narcotics Drugs and

                   Psychotropic Substances Act.

                                 3. As per the prosecution case, the total recovery is of

                   160 kgs of ganja from the maize field.

                                 4. The petitioner has been caught on the spot. He is in

                   custody since 20.05.2025.

                                 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is a labour and he was engaged for petty amount to

                   transport the ganja kept in sacks. He did not know that he was

                   carrying ganja.
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23610 of 2026(2) dt.15-04-2026
                                                       2/2




                                  6. Learned APP appearing for the State has

                     vehemently opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

                                  7. Considering the huge recovery of ganja, I am not

                     inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

                                  8. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

                                  9. The Court below is directed to conclude the trial at

                     the earliest.

                                  10. The Superintendent of Police, Araria is directed to

                     ensure the appearance of the witnesses.

                                  11. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the

                     Principal District and Sessions Judge, Araria and the

                     Superintendent Police, Patna through FAX or e-mail for its

                     compliance.

                                  12. It is, however, clarified that the observations made

                     herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail

                     application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at

                     any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not express

                     any opinion on the merits of the case.


                                                                          (Sandeep Kumar, J)

P. Kumar

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.