Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Reshma KhatoonversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court allowed anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to a bail bond and sureties under section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

Summary

The petitioner, Reshma Khatoon, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in Mirganj P.S. Case No. 08 of 2026, which alleged theft of jewellery and cash, and assault on the informant under several sections of the B.N.S. The prosecution’s case was based on the informant’s allegation that the petitioner and co‑accused stole valuables and later assaulted her when confronted. The petitioner’s counsel highlighted a 22‑day delay in lodging the FIR, the generic nature of the allegations, the informant’s simple injury, the familial relationship between petitioner and informant, and the petitioner’s clean record. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, opposed the grant of anticipatory bail. After hearing both sides, the court held that anticipatory bail could be granted subject to a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties, invoking its inherent powers under section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. The application for anticipatory bail was therefore allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in view of the alleged offences and the delay in filing the FIR
  • Whether the allegations against the petitioner are specific enough to deny bail

Legislation cited

  • B.N.S. — s. 109, 115, 126, 303(2), 3(5), 351(2), 352
  • B.N.S.S. — s. 482(2)

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • delay in FIR
  • theft
  • assault
  • section 482
  • bail bond
  • criminal antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23647 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2026 Thana- MIRGANJ District- Gopalganj
                 ======================================================
                 Reshma Khatoon W/O Mohammad Alam Shah @ Rabbe Alam Shah R/O
                 Village Fatehpur Zindapatti, P.S.- Mirganj, District - Gopalganj.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Rizwanul Jama Khan, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   22-04-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case in

                   connection with Mirganj P.S. Case No. 08 of 2026 dated

                   07.01.2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section

                   303(2), 126, 115, 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, the informant alleged

                   that this petitioner along with co-accused Shabina Khatoon with

                   an intention to commit theft in her house opened her almirah

                   and took out gold, silver as well as diamond ornaments and cash

                   worth Rs. 25,000/- and when the informant reached her house

                   and opened her almirah she didn’t find the jewellery kept in it.

                   Thereafter, it is alleged that she started questioning the

                   petitioner and co-accused Shabina Khatoon, whereupon both of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23647 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026
                                            2/3




          them started abusing the informant. It is further alleged that in

          the meantime other co-accused persons came and started

          assaulting her with lathi and danda resulting into head injury. It

          is further alleged that several times panchayati was convened,

          but no settlement was done.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

          that there is a delay of 22 days in lodging the FIR without any

          plausible explanation and there is general and omnibus

          allegation against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the

          petitioner referring to Annexure-2 of this petition has submitted

          that the injury sustained by the informant is simple in nature. It

          has further been submitted that this petitioner and informant are

          sister-in-law in relation and the petitioner has got no criminal

          antecedent.

                       5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Heard the parties and perused the record, let the

          above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender

          within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on

          anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/-

          (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each

          to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Gopalganj in
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23647 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026
                                                       3/3




                     connection with Mirganj P.S. Case No. 08 of 2026, subject to

                     conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

                                  7. The application stands allowed.



                                                (Praveen Kumar, J)
shivam/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.