Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Raja Kumar @ Raja BabuversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court allowed the petition for anticipatory bail, subject to bond and surety conditions.

Summary

Petitioner Raja Kumar, owner of a motorcycle, was implicated in a case where police intercepted the vehicle carrying 30 litres of illicit country-made liquor and arrested a co-accused who named the petitioner as a co‑offender. The petitioner feared arrest and applied for anticipatory bail, contending that the search and seizure violated mandatory procedural provisions and that he has no prior criminal record. The State opposed the bail, relying on the alleged involvement under Section 317(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The Court examined the material and, while noting the seriousness of the offence, considered the petitioner’s claim of innocence and lack of antecedents. It granted anticipatory bail subject to a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., directing surrender within six weeks if arrested.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under the applicable provisions.
  • Whether the search and seizure conducted by the police complied with mandatory legal requirements.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • search and seizure
  • illegal liquor
  • Section 317
  • Section 30
  • Section 482
  • criminal procedure
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23653 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-60 Year-2026 Thana- SHIVSAGAR District- Rohtas
                 ======================================================
                 Raja Kumar @ Raja Babu Son of Dhanji Ram Resident of Mohalla - Baulia,
                 P.S.- Sasaram Nagar, District - Rohtas.
                                                                        ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                 ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Shashikant, Advocate
                                                  Mrs. Priyanka Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Syed Mojibur Rahman, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   22-04-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case in

                   connection with Shivsagar P.S. Case No. 60 of 2026 dated

                   17.02.2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section

                   317(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and

                   Excise Act.

                                 3. As per the allegation, on a secret information, a

                   motorcycle was intercepted in which two people were found

                   seated, one person managed to escape and one came to be

                   arrested. The arrested person disclosed his name as Amarjeet

                   Kumar and altogether 30 litres of illicit country-made liquor

                   was recovered.

                                 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23653 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026
                                                       2/2




                     that petitioner happens to be the owner of the motorcycle in

                     question and the co-accused has named this petitioner only to

                     save himself and had the petitioner been present there he would

                     have been arrested there itself when many police personnels

                     were present there. The search and seizure list is in violation of

                     mandatory provisions as regarding the search and seizure. It has

                     further been submitted that petitioner has got no criminal

                     antecedent.

                                  5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

                     opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

                                  6. Heard the parties and perused the record, let the

                     above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender

                     within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on

                     anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/-

                     (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each

                     to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Sasaram in

                     connection with Shivsagar P.S. Case No. 60 of 2026, subject to

                     conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

                                  7. The application stands allowed.



                                                (Praveen Kumar, J)
shivam/-
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.