Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pravind KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
REJECTED

Holding

The court refused bail, holding that the seriousness of the allegations and the victim's minority preclude the grant of bail.

Summary

Pravind Kumar was arrested on 5 January 2026 in connection with a case registered on 23 September 2025 alleging that he had sexual relations with a 15‑year‑old girl under the pretext of marriage. The petitioner sought bail, claiming a clean antecedent and that the allegations were fabricated. The State opposed bail, relying on the victim’s statement recorded under Sections 180/183 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023, which corroborated the prosecution’s case, and emphasizing the victim’s minor status. The court examined the seriousness of the offences under Sections 64, 351(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act, and the credibility of the victim’s testimony. Concluding that the nature of the allegations and the victim’s minority warranted denial of bail, the court refused the petitioner's bail application.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in a POCSO case involving a minor victim and serious offences under the B.N.S., 2023.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • POCSO
  • minor victim
  • sexual assault
  • criminal procedure
  • bail jurisprudence

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23659 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-192 Year-2025 Thana- KACCHWA District- Rohtas
                 ======================================================
                 Pravind Kumar Son of Sudama Singh R/o Village - Ibrahimpur, P.S. -
                 Kachhwan, Distt. - Rohtas.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar Bihar
           2.    XXXX Son of Sudama Singh R/o Village - Saraiyan, P.S. - Kachhwan, Distt.
                 - Rohtas.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Bijendra Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   08-04-2026                    Heard Mr. Bijendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel

                   for the petitioner and Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, learned APP

                   for the State.

                                   2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

                   05.01.2026, in connection with Kachhawan P.S. Case No. 192

                   of 2025, F.I.R. dated 23.09.2025 registered for the offences

                   punishable under Sections 64, 351(2), 3(5)of the B.N.S., 2023

                   and Sections 4/6 of the POCSO Act.

                                   3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he has

                   established physical relation with the victim on several occasion

                   on the pretext of marriage.

                                   4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23659 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026
                                            2/3




          the petitioner has clean antecedent and he has been falsely

          implicated in the present case. He further submits that the

          allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the

          petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R.

          As per allegation in the F.I.R. that the petitioner has established

          physical relation with the victim on several occasion on the

          pretext of marriage. He further submits that the allegation as

          alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and in fact the

          informant has not informed her parents about the occurrence

          and she has informed the parent of the petition about the present

          occurrence.

                        5. Learned APP for the State, on the other hand,

          vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and

          submits that the statement of the victim was recorded under

          Sections 180/183 of the B.N.S.S. in which she has fully

          supported the case of the prosecution and apart from that the age

          of the victim was 15 years which suggests that on the date of

          occurrence she was minor.

                         6. Considering the nature of allegation supported by

          the victim in her statement recorded under Sections 180/ 183 of

          the B.N.S.S., I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail

          in connection with Kachhawan P.S. Case No. 192 of 2025
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23659 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026
                                                       3/3




                     pending in the Court of learned District & Additional Sessions

                     Judge-VIIth-cum-Special Judge (POCSO), Rohtas.

                                      7. Prayer is refused.



                                                                   (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Ibrar//-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.