Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Vimal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted regular bail to the petitioner subject to a bail bond and sureties.

Summary

Vimal Kumar was arrested in connection with a case (PS Dulhin Bazar No.155/2024) alleging offences under sections 307, 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, stemming from a land‑measurement dispute. The prosecution alleged that nine accused, including the petitioner, assaulted the informant with various weapons, causing grievous injuries. The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated, the allegations were vague, and he had no prior criminal record, having been in custody since 16 January 2026. The State argued that the injuries were serious. After hearing both sides, the Court noted the general nature of the allegations and the petitioner’s prolonged detention, and ordered that he be released on regular bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the same amount.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail despite the serious nature of the offences alleged under the IPC.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Indian Penal Code
  • assault
  • false implication
  • land dispute
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23739 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-155 Year-2024 Thana- DULHIN BAZAR District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Vimal Kumar S/o Jagdev Yadav R/o - Kataiypar, Ward No. 09, Post - Bhimni
                 Chak, P.S- Dulhin Bazar, District - Patna - 801102 Aadhar - 359555395051,
                 Mob - 6207338546

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Sanjay Jha, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   08-04-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the parties.

                                2. The petitioner has preferred this application for

                   grant of regular bail in connection with Dulhin Bazar P.S. Case

                   no. 155 of 2024 registered under sections 307, 147, 148, 149,

                   341, 323, 324, 325, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states

                   that nine named accused persons including the petitioner herein

                   are said to have came variously armed. It is further stated that

                   over a dispute relating to the pillar fixed by the amin for

                   measurement of the land as also throwing of the waste, it is

                   stated that the accused persons assaulted the informant and

                   others with lathi, danda, iron rod, khanti, bricks, etc as a result

                   of which the informant and others were injured.
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23739 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026
                                                       2/2




                                  4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                     petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The allegations are

                     false and concocted. The allegations are general and omnibus in

                     nature and the injury report does not support the allegation of assault

                     by so many persons. The petitioner is in custody since 16.1.2026 and

                     has no criminal antecedent.

                                  5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                     for the State who submits that the injury sustained by the

                     informant has been opined to be grievous in nature.

                                  6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                     taking into consideration the allegations in the FIR, the

                     allegations being of assault by nine named accused persons, the

                     allegation against the petitioner being general and omnibus in

                     nature and the petitioner having remained in custody since

                     16.1.2026, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in

                     connection with Dulhin Bazar P.S. Case no. 155 of 2024 on

                     furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two

                     sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                     Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Danapur, Patna.



                                                 (Partha Sarthy, J)
sauravkrsinha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.