Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kamlesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED
Bench
ANSUL

Holding

Bail was granted because the alleged liquor was not in the petitioner’s possession and he had been detained for an extended period.

Summary

The petitioner, Kamlesh Yadav, was arrested in connection with the recovery of 120 litres of country-made liquor from a vehicle, alleged under Sections 30(a) and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He applied for bail, contending that the seized liquor was not in his possession and that he had been in custody since 20‑02‑2026. The State, represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor, opposed the bail. The Court noted the lack of direct possession by the petitioner and the length of his pre‑trial detention, and consequently granted bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties. The order was made on a prima facie basis, without prejudice to the merits of the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act when the alleged contraband was not in his possession.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise
  • prohibition
  • liquor seizure
  • criminal procedure
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23884 of 2026
                       Arising out of PS. Case No.-190 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Nawada
                 ======================================================
                 Kamlesh Yadav S/o Ganauri Prasad Yadav @ Ganauri Yadav VILLAGE-
                 Mohkama, P.S. - Rajauli, DISTRICT- Nawada

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr. Deepak Kumar, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr. Meena Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANSUL
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   19-05-2026                 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                              2. The petitioner seeks bail in Nawada Excise P.S. Case

                   No. 190 of 2026, registered for the offence punishable under

                   Sections 30(a), 37 of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                               3. The allegation is that there is recovery of total 120

                   liters of country made liquor from vehicle in question.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   alleged recovery was not made from the possession of the

                   petitioner. He further submits that the petitioner is in custody

                   since 20.02.2026.

                               5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State

                   has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                               6. Considering that the alleged recovery was not made
                Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23884 of 2026(3) dt.19-05-2026
                                            2/2




           from the possession of the petitioner and the petitioner is in

           custody since 20.02.2026, this Court is inclined to grant bail to

           the petitioner.

                     7. Let the petitioner, above named, be released

           on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten

           thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to

           the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special

           Excise Court-2, Nawada, in connection with Nawada

           Excise P.S. Case No. 190 of 2026.

                      8. It is made clear that any observation made

           herein is prima facie in nature and limited solely for

           the purpose of            adjudication of             the    present   bail

           application. Such observations shall not be construed

           as an expression on the merits of the case and shall not

           influence the trial or any other proceedings in any

           manner.



                                           (Ansul, J)
Vikash/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.