Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Aaradhya Farma Agency, Proprietor Ruchi KumariversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was refused.

Summary

The petitioner, Ruchi Kumari, proprietor of Aaradhya Pharma Agency, applied for anticipatory bail in a case registered under Sections 8(C), 21(C) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. The prosecution alleged that a raid on a freight carrier’s godown recovered 479 litres of illegal codeine syrup, cash, a mobile phone and, notably, 2,880 bottles of 100 ml codeine syrup bearing the petitioner’s company name. The court examined the magnitude of the seizure and the petitioner’s ownership of the agency implicated in the illegal possession. Considering the substantial quantity of narcotics recovered and the material evidence linking the petitioner’s firm to the contraband, the court concluded that the circumstances did not merit the grant of anticipatory bail. Consequently, the petition for anticipatory bail was rejected.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted to the proprietor of a pharma agency when a large quantity of narcotic drug (codeine syrup) is recovered in the name of the agency under the NDPS Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • NDPS Act
  • codeine syrup
  • seizure of narcotics
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.239 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-498 Year-2025 Thana- PURNEA SADAR District- Purnia
                 ======================================================
                 Aaradhya Farma Agency, Proprietor Ruchi Kumari W/o Chandan Kumar
                 Thakur Resident of Village- Bhawandevi Tola, P.S- Bhawanipur, District-
                 Purnea, Bihar

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Navin Kumar, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jha, Adv
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Nagendra Prasad, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   20-02-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

                                2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in Sadar P. S. Case No.

                   498 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 8(C), 21(C), 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and

                   Psychotropic Substances Act.

                                3. Prosecution case, in brief, is that on a secret

                   information, a raid was conducted in the godown of Jharkhand

                   Bengal Freight Carrier Private Limited’s Company Hansda

                   Road Gulabbagh where 479 liters of illegal codeine syrup,

                   mobile phone with SIM, stamp of A.S. Pharma proprietor and

                   cash of Rs. 5,100/- was recovered. In the aforesaid raid, 2880

                   bottles of 100 ml each codeine syrup in the name of Aaradhya

                   Pharma Agency, i.e., company of this petitioner was also
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.239 of 2026(3) dt.20-02-2026
                                                          2/2




                        recovered.

                                     4. Considering the huge recovery of codeine syrup,

                        materials available on record and petitioner being proprietor of

                        Aaradhya Pharma Agency, prayer for anticipatory bail of the

                        petitioner is refused.



                                              (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Navya/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.