Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kalu KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that, in view of the petitioner’s clean record, the circumstances of the seizure and the extended custody, regular bail should be granted.

Summary

Kalu Kumar, the driver of an e‑rickshaw, was arrested after 126 litres of illicit country‑made liquor were recovered from beneath the driver’s seat. He contended that he was unaware of the liquor, was not the vehicle’s owner, and that the seizure violated Section 105 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act. The petition sought regular bail for offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act and Section 317(5) of the B.N.S. The State opposed the bail. The Court, after considering the facts, the petitioner’s lack of criminal antecedent and the period of custody, ordered that bail be granted on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, and allowed the application.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail for the offences under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act and the B.N.S.
  • Whether the seizure of the liquor violated Section 105 of the B.N.S.
  • Whether the petitioner’s lack of prior record and the length of custody justify bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • illegal liquor
  • prohibition act
  • search and seizure
  • e‑rickshaw
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23961 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2026 Thana- SAHIYARA District- Sitamarhi
                 ======================================================
                 Kalu Kumar S/O Raju Mandal R/O- Village- Kowari Madan (Kuari Madan),
                 Ward No. 05, P.S- Mejourganj, District - Sitamarhi.
                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                     ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Diwakar, Advocate
                                                   Mr. Pallav Kumar Singh, Advocate
                                                   Ms. Priya Kumari, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Kanhaiya Kishore (App.100)
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   12-05-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner has preferred this application for

                   grant of regular bail in connection with Sahiyara P.S. Case No.

                   21 of 2026 dated 23.02.2026 registered for the offences

                   punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and

                   Excise (Amendment) Act and Section 317(5) of B.N.S.

                                 3. As per the allegation, total 126 litres of illicit

                   country-made liquor was recovered beneath the driver seat of E-

                   rickshaw. The petitioner being the driver of the said E-rickshaw

                   was arrested.

                                 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

                   that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this

                   case. It has further been submitted that petitioner was not aware
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23961 of 2026(3) dt.12-05-2026
                                                       2/2




                     of the articles being kept underneath the driver seat. It has

                     further been submitted that petitioner is not the owner of the E-

                     rickshaw and he was plying the same at the instruction of the

                     owner. It has further been submitted that search and seizure is in

                     violation of Section 105 of B.N.S.S. Learned counsel for the

                     petitioner has further submitted that petitioner is in custody

                     since 25.02.2026 and has got no criminal antecedent.

                                  5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

                     opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                                  6. Heard the parties and perused the record.

                                  7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case

                     as well as the period of custody, the petitioner above-named is

                     directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of

                     Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

                     amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned,

                     Sitamarhi in connection with Sahiyara P.S. Case No. 21 of 2026.

                                  8. The application stands allowed.



                                                (Praveen Kumar, J)
shivam/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.