Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ranjan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail is granted to the petitioner subject to the stipulated conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Ranjan Kumar, was arrested on 12 February 2026 in connection with the recovery of 234 litres of illicit liquor and charged under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He applied for bail, claiming innocence and asserting that no prior excise case is registered against him, and offered to donate Rs. 25,000 to a charitable organization. The State opposed the bail. The High Court, after considering the submissions, granted bail on the condition that the petitioner furnish a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of equal amount, deposit Rs.25,000 with the Ramakrishna Mission Ashram, and attend Yadopur Police Station every Sunday, subject to verification of his lack of prior excise record. The order expressly limited its observations to the bail application and did not prejudice the merits of the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to a person accused under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for possession of illicit liquor.
  • Whether the conditions imposed—bond, sureties, monetary deposit, and regular police station attendance—are appropriate and lawful.
  • Whether the petitioner’s claim of having no prior excise case affects the grant of bail.

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise law
  • illicit liquor
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • criminal procedure
  • surety
  • conditions of bail

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24025 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-131 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Gopalganj
                 ======================================================
                 Ranjan Kumar S/o Belara Chaudhary Resident of Village- Nawada, P.S.-
                 Yadopur, Dist.- Gopalganj
                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                              Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar
                                                                ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Adesh Raj Singh
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Parmanand Prasad
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   20-04-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Excise

                   P.S. Case No. 131 of 2026 registered for the offence under

                   Section 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                 3. The recovery is of 234 liters of illicit liquor.

                                 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and he is in custody since 12.02.2026. He

                   further submits that the petitioner has no case of excise act

                   registered against him.

                                 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is ready to donate Rs. 25,000/- in some charitable

                   organization without accepting his guilt.

                                 6. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the

                   prayer for bail of the petitioner.

                                  7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

                   case and submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, let
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24025 of 2026(2) dt.20-04-2026
                                            2/3




          the petitioner, above named, be released on bail upon furnishing

          bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the

          like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned concerned

          Court below in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 131 of

          2026.

                        8. This is also subject to the condition that the

          petitioner shall deposit an amount of Rs. 25,000/- in

          Ramakrishna Mission Ashram, Latu Maharaj Path, Chhapra and

          produce the receipt of the same before the Court below. The bail

          bonds of the petitioner shall be accepted after verifying the

          genuineness of the receipt produced by the petitioner.

                       9. As a condition of this order, the petitioner after

          being released on bail is directed to mark his attendance at

          Yadopur Police Station on every Sunday of each month. Any

          default in appearance at the police station will result in

          cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner.

                       10. As the petitioner claims that the petitioner has no

          case registered against him under the excise act, the Court

          below is directed to verify the same before accepting the bail

          bonds of the petitioner. It is made clear that the bail bonds of the

          petitioner shall only be accepted if he has no criminal history

          under excise act.
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24025 of 2026(2) dt.20-04-2026
                                                      3/3




                                    11. It is, however, clarified that the observations

                    made herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail

                    application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at

                    any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not

                    expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.


                                                               (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-
U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.