Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pancham KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Summary

The petitioners, Pancham Kumar and Sanjiv Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail in connection with a case of alleged theft of three buffaloes, wherein the police recovered two buffaloes, a pickup truck and a mobile phone. The prosecution alleged that the vehicle belonged to petitioner no. 2 and that petitioner no. 1 was the driver, based on the mobile phone recovered. The petitioners argued that mere ownership of the vehicle and the phone does not establish participation in the offence and that there is no independent evidence linking them. The court noted the nature of the offence, the absence of any criminal antecedent, and the lack of substantive material against the petitioners. Consequently, the court exercised its power under Section 438 CrPC and Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023, and granted anticipatory bail subject to conditions.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted when the only link to the alleged offence is ownership of a vehicle and alleged use of a mobile phone.
  • Whether the nature of the alleged theft of livestock warrants denial of anticipatory bail.
  • Whether the petitioners' clean criminal record influences the grant of anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • theft of livestock
  • vehicle ownership
  • Section 438 CrPC
  • Section 482 BNSS
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24047 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-472 Year-2025 Thana- NAUBATPUR District- Patna
                 ======================================================
           1.     Pancham Kumar S/o Shankar Nut R/o Vill.- Itwan, P.S.- Rampur Chauram,
                  Distt.- Arwal
           2.    Sanjiv Kumar S/o Shahendra Khalifa R/o vill - Balidad, P.S.- Mehandiya,
                 Dist- Arwal

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Rama Shankar Gautam
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Rajiv Nayan
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   22-04-2026                     1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                   2. This application, for grant of anticipatory bail,

                   arises out of Naubatpur Police Station Case No. 472 of 2025,

                   disclosing offences under Sections 303(2), 317(2) of the BNS,

                   2023.

                                   3. As per the prosecution case, three buffaloes

                   belonging to the informant were stolen on the night of 14/15

                   August, 2025. During a search, witnesses spotted a pickup

                   vehicle carrying the stolen animals and several persons, who

                   fled when chased, abandoning one buffalo and later the vehicle.

                   The police recovered two buffaloes, the pickup truck, and a
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24047 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026
                                            2/3




          mobile phone from the scene. During investigation, petitioner

          no. 2 was identified as the owner of the vehicle, and petitioner

          no. 1 as the driver based on the recovered mobile phone.

                          4. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that

          petitioner no. 2 has been implicated solely on the basis of

          ownership of the vehicle, which does not, by itself, establish

          involvement in the alleged offence. The alleged use of a mobile

          phone by petitioner no. 1 is a matter of trial and does not justify

          custodial interrogation. It is further submitted that there is no

          cogent material or independent witness to connect the

          petitioners with the alleged occurrence.

                          5. Having regard to the submissions made on

          behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the nature of

          offence and the fact that petitioners are having no criminal

          antecedent, I am inclined to grant the petitioners privilege of

          anticipatory bail.

                          6. This application is, accordingly, allowed.

                          7. Let the petitioners, above named, in the event of

          their arrest or surrender before the Court below within four

          weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

          10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

          each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24047 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026
                                                       3/3




                     Magistrate-VI, Danapur, Patna, in connection with Naubatpur

                     Police Station Case No. 472 of 2025, subject to the condition

                     laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal

                     Procedure/Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023.



                                              (Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
HarshPandey/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.