Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Raj Kishor RayversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Summary

The petitioners, Raj Kishor Ray and Bablu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case alleging offences under IPC sections 147, 148, 324, 307 and 34, arising from a land dispute with the informant. The prosecution claimed the petitioners entered the informant’s courtyard, assaulted persons with weapons and caused property damage on 25‑03‑2024. The petitioners argued they were falsely implicated due to an ongoing land dispute, a pending counter‑case and a partition suit, and that the injuries were minor. The court noted the existence of a counter‑case and partition suit, and considered the lack of strong material against the petitioners. Consequently, the court granted anticipatory bail subject to a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, invoking Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners despite the FIR alleging serious offences under the IPC.
  • Whether the pending land dispute, counter‑case and partition suit affect the merit of the anticipatory bail application.
  • Whether the conditions of Section 438(2) CrPC and Section 482(2) BNSS, 2023 are satisfied.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • land dispute
  • false implication
  • IPC offences
  • partition suit
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • BNSS 2023

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24118 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-199 Year-2024 Thana- SAKRA District- Muzaffarpur
                 ======================================================
           1.     Raj Kishor Ray S/o Lakshman Ray R/o Village - Raypur, P.S - Sakra,
                  District - Muzaffarpur
           2.    Bablu Kumar S/o Rajkishor Ray R/o Village - Raypur, P.S - Sakra, District -
                 Muzaffarpur

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. N.K. Aggarwal, Sr. Adv.
                                          :        Mr. Raju Kumar, Adv.
                                          :        Mr. Shubham Samrat, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Kalyan Shankar, App.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   22-04-2026                      1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                    2. This application, for grant of anticipatory bail,

                   arises out of Sakra Police Station Case No. 199 of 2024,

                   disclosing offences under Sections 147, 148, 324, 307, 34 of the

                   Indian Penal Code.

                                    3. The prosecution alleges that on 25.03.2024, the

                   accused persons unlawfully entered the informant’s courtyard,

                   assaulted several individuals with weapons causing head

                   injuries, restrained victims, and damaged household property.

                                    4. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that

                   the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24118 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026
                                            2/3




          due to ulterior motives. Both the parties are agnates having

          previous land dispute. It is further submitted that a counter-case,

          bearing Sakra P.S. Case No. 205 of 2024, on similar allegations

          has been instituted, wherein the police, after investigation, did

          not find sufficient material to send the petitioners for trial,

          however, the learned Magistrate has taken cognizance contrary

          to the charge-sheet. A partition suit bearing No. 980 of 2024 is

          also pending between the parties. The present FIR has been

          lodged after a delay of two days. The injuries sustained are

          simple in nature.

                          5. Having regard to the submissions made on

          behalf of the parties and taking into consideration the fact that

          both the parties are agnates having land dispute between them,

          there is case and counter case and partition suit is pending

          between the parties, I am inclined to grant the petitioners

          privilege of anticipatory bail.

                          6. This application is, accordingly, allowed.

                          7. Let the petitioners, above named, in the event of

          their arrest or surrender before the Court below within four

          weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.

          10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

          each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24118 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026
                                                       3/3




                     (East) Muzaffarpur, in connection with Sakra Police Station

                     Case No. 199 of 2024, subject to the condition laid down under

                     Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section

                     482(2) of the BNSS, 2023.



                                              (Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
HarshPandey/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.