Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. ImranversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The anticipatory bail petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Md. Imran petitioned the Patna High Court for anticipatory bail, fearing arrest in Vaishali Mahila P.S. Case No. 88 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 69, 89, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act. The court noted that the mentioning slip indicated that processes had been issued under Section 82 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 84 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act. In view of these procedural safeguards, the petitioner was allowed to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. Consequently, the court dismissed the anticipatory bail petition as withdrawn. The order was pronounced by Justice Rajiv Roy.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted in the present case
  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw the anticipatory bail petition
  • Whether the issuance of processes under Section 82 CrPC and Section 84 B.N.S.S. affects the grant of anticipatory bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal of petition
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Bihar Narcotic Substances Act
  • high court order
  • procedural safeguard

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24122 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-88 Year-2025 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Vaishali
                  ======================================================
                  Md. Imran Son of Md. Salim R/o Village - Bihari, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, District
                  - Vaishali.
                                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
                  The State of Bihar                                   ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :        Ms. Anjali Kumari, Advocate
                  For the State            :        Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                        ORAL ORDER

4    20-05-2026                    Heard the parties through virtual mode.

                                  2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in

                    connection with Vaishali Mahila P.S. Case No. 88 of 2025

                    registered for the offence punishable under Sections 69, 89,

                    351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., lodged on 15.11.2025 by the

                    informant Anguri Khatoon.

                                  3. The mentioning slip shows that the processes

                    issued under section 82 of the Cr.P.C. and 84 of the B.N.S.S.

                    and as such, he may be permitted to withdraw the petition.

                                  4. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail petition stands

                    dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                    (Rajiv Roy, J)
vinayak/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.