Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Hakim Manjhi @ Hakim MusharversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The Court granted permission to withdraw the application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner filed an application before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the application, the sole petitioner was arrested. The petitioner, through counsel, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the pending application on account of his arrest. The Court considered the request and granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petitioner who is arrested during the pendency of an application may be permitted to withdraw the application

Subjects

  • withdrawal of application
  • arrest
  • procedural law
  • high court
  • criminal miscellaneous

Judgment

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24173 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-44 Year-2026 Thana- SIRISIYA District- West Champaran
                   ======================================================
                   Hakim Manjhi @ Hakim Mushar Son of Late Anwat Manjhi R/o Village -
                   Garbhwa Toli, P.S.- Sirishiya, Dist.- West Champaran.

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                   The State of Bihar Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party/s
                   ======================================================
                   Appearance :
                   For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Gyan Prakash
                   For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Md. Nazir Ansari
                   ======================================================
                   CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA
                                         ORAL ORDER

2     22-04-2026                  1. Mr. Gyan Prakash, learned counsel for the

                     petitioner submits that during pendency of this application the

                     sole petitioner has been arrested, as such, he seeks permission to

                     withdraw this application.

                                  2. Permission is granted.

                                  3. The application is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                (Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
praful/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.