Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Gokul KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The application for regular bail was dismissed; the petitioner is not entitled to bail.

Summary

Gokul Kumar was charged under IPC sections 413, 414 and 34 and NDPS Act sections 20(b)(ii)(B), 23(c) and 27(b) for possession of 25.3 kg of ganja, a motorcycle, looted bank items and cash. The prosecution recovered the seized material and charges have been framed, with the trial already underway. The petitioner filed a second regular bail application after an earlier bail denial. The High Court examined the gravity of the offences and the fact that the trial had commenced. Finding no sufficient ground to revisit its earlier order, the Court dismissed the bail application and directed the lower court to expedite the trial and ensure witness attendance. The order was communicated to the Superintendent of Police for compliance.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioner given the seriousness of the offences and the commencement of trial

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • IPC
  • NDPS Act
  • gravity of offence
  • trial commencement
  • witness attendance
  • bail application

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24176 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-145 Year-2023 Thana- BIDUPUR District- Vaishali
                 ======================================================
                 Gokul Kumar Son of Lal Babu Mahto Resident of Village - Gandhi Chok,
                 Pokhra Mohalla, P.S.- Town Hajipur, District - Vaishali.

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Vasant Vikas, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Md. Mushtaque Alam,APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   01-05-2026                    Heard the parties.

                                2. This is the second attempt of the petitioner for grant

                   of regular bail in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No. 145 of

                   2023 registered for the offence under Sections 413, 414 and 34

                   of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 20(b)(ii)(B), 23(c),

                   27(b) of the NDPS Act. Earlier the bail application of the

                   petitioner was rejected vide order dated 14.03.2024 passed in

                   Cr. Misc. No. 18063 of 2024.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, 25.300 kgs of Ganja,

                   one motorcycle, looted article from the Indian Bank Allahabad

                   CSP i.e. a laptop, laptop charger, two finger print machine,

                   mobile charger, ten passbooks of Allahabad Savings Account

                   and cash of Rs. 13,170/- were recovered from the petitioner.

                                4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24176 of 2026(2) dt.01-05-2026
                                                          2/2




                        petitioner that in the trial, charges have been framed.

                                     5. Considering the gravity of offence and the fact that

                        the trial has started, this Court finds no ground to review its

                        earlier order.

                                     6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed again

                        with direction to the concerned court below to expedite the trial

                        and the Superintendent of Police, Vaishali is directed to ensure

                        the appearance of the witnesses in the trial.

                                     7. Let a copy of this order be communicated through

                        FAX or e-mail to the Superintendent of Police, Vaishali for its

                        compliance.



                                                   (Sandeep Kumar, J)
tusharika/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.