Anjanee KumarversusThe State of Bihar

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24458 of 2026

                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2026 Thana- VIGILANCE District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Anjanee Kumar son of Jay Prakash Prasad @ Jay Prakash Singh R/o-Village-
                 Parandihara, P.O.-Diviyan, P.S-Karaghar, Dist.-Rohtas Sasaram.
                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
           1.     The State of Bihar
           2.     The Dept. of Vigilance, Through it Director General, Bihar, Patna
                                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Onkar Nath, Advocate, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Rana Vikram Singh, (Law Officer)
                 For the State            :       APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   15-04-2026                  Heard Mr. Onkar Nath, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner and Mr. Rana Vikram Singh, learned counsel for the

                   Vigilance and learned APP for the State.

                                2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

                   30.01.2026 in connection with Special Vigilance Unit P.S. Case

                   No. 04 of 2026, F.I.R. dated 29.01.2026 for the offences

                   punishable under Section 7 of the P.C. Act, 1988 and Section

                   61(2) (A) of the B.N.S.

                                3. The allegation against the petitioner is that he has

                   taken Rs. 20,000/- at the instance of co-accused Ravi Shankar

                   Ram and the petitioner was caught raid handed while accepting

                   the bribe.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24458 of 2026(2) dt.15-04-2026
                                            2/3




          petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been

          implicated in the present case. The allegation as alleged in the

          FIR is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed

          any offence as alleged in the FIR and the similarly situated co-

          accused person, namely, Ravi Shankar Ram has been granted

          regular bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court vide

          order dated 10.04.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 17358 of 2026

          and petitioner is in custody since 30.01.2026.

                       5. Learned counsel for the Vigilance opposed the

          prayer for bail and submitted that the chargesheet has been

          submitted against the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          of the case, clean antecedent of the petitioner and similarly

          situated co-accused person, namely, Ravi Shankar Ram has been

          granted regular bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Hon’ble

          Court, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on

          furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two

          sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

          court of Special Judge, Vigilance, Patna, in connection with

          Special Vigilance Unit P.S. Case No. 04 of 2026, with the

          following conditions:

                       i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24458 of 2026(2) dt.15-04-2026
                                                        3/3




                      properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court

                      and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and

                      on her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

                      reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                                   ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

                      witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move

                      for cancellation of bail.

                                   iii. And further condition that the court below shall

                      verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

                      any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

                      criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for

                      cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the

                      acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                      shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                      verification.


                                             (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

Ranjeet/-

U      T