Patna High Court
Umesh Yadav @ Umesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- PRAVEEN KUMAR
Holding
The application is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioners, Umesh Yadav and others, filed an application in the High Court of Judicature at Patna in a criminal miscellaneous matter arising from a 2020 police case. The petitioners, through counsel Mr. Piyush Saurav, sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the application. The Court, after hearing on 31‑03‑2026, granted the request for withdrawal. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn. The judgment expressly notes that the Court did not express any opinion on the merits of the underlying case.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner's application can be withdrawn
Subjects
- withdrawal of application
- criminal miscellaneous proceedings
- high court order
- petition dismissed
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24466 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-50 Year-2020 Thana- GURARU District- Gaya
======================================================
1. Umesh Yadav @ Umesh Kumar Son of Late Sukhdeo Yadav Resident of
Village and Post- Konchi, P.S.- Guraru, Dist.- Gaya
2. Jay Prakash Yadav @ Satprakash Kumar @ Jai Prakash Kumar Son of
Umesh Yadav Resident of Village and Post- Konchi, P.S.- Guraru, Dist.-
Gaya
3. Vikram Kumar @ Vikrant Kumar Son of Late Bigan Yadav @ Dharmendra
Kumar Resident of Village and Post- Konchi, P.S.- Guraru, Dist.- Gaya
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar Patna
2. Manu Devi Wife of Sri Krishna Chaudhary Resident of Village and Post-
Konchi, P.S.- Guraru, Dist.- Gaya
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Piyush Saurav, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sadanand Paswan, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 31-03-2026 Heard the parties.
2. At the very outset, the learned counsel for
petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
5. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any
opinion on the merits of the case.
(Praveen Kumar, J)
Jyoti/-
U T
Checking your session…