Patna High Court
Rajgir Yadav @ Rajgir YadabversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
Anticipatory bail was not granted; the application was dismissed.
Summary
Petitioner Rajgir Yadav sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving the seizure of 810 litres of illicit liquor. The prosecution alleged offences under Sections 274, 275, 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner’s name appeared in a self‑incriminatory statement of a co‑accused. The court considered the seriousness of the offence and the large quantity of liquor recovered. Concluding that the circumstances did not merit relief, the court refused anticipatory bail and dismissed the application.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner in view of the self‑incriminatory statement and the large quantity of illicit liquor seized
Legislation cited
- Bihar Narcotic Substances Act — s. 274, 275, 3(5)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- illicit liquor
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
- Bihar Narcotic Substances Act
- self‑incriminatory statement
- criminal procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24615 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-180 Year-2025 Thana- MADHWAPUR District- Madhubani
======================================================
Rajgir Yadav @ Rajgir Yadab S/o- Laxman Yadav Village- Mukhiya Patii PS-
Musharniya District- Phulgama District- Dhanusa, Nepal
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ravi Prakash
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Kanhiya Kishor
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 01-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in
connection with Madhwapur P.S. Case No. 180 of 2025
registered for the offence under Section 274, 275, 3(5) of the
BNS and under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and
Excise Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, the recovery is of
810 liters of illicit liquor.
4. The name of the petitioner has come in the self-
inculpatory statement of the co-accused.
5. Considering the quantum of recovery, this Court
is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24615 of 2026(2) dt.01-05-2026
2/2
6. Accordingly, this application for anticipatory
bail is dismissed.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-
U
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.