Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ajay KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioners.

Summary

The petitioners, Ajay Kumar and Haribol Kumar, were arrested in connection with the seizure of 107.3 litres of wiscuf cough syrup from a vehicle and charged under sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. They contended that they were merely passengers, had no possession of the seized goods, and that the police failed to comply with Section 105 of the BNSS while preparing the seizure list. The petitioners also highlighted their clean criminal record and that they had been in judicial custody since 3 February 2026. The State opposed the grant of regular bail. After hearing both sides, the Patna High Court found merit in the petitioners' arguments and ordered that they be released on regular bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 each with two sureties, subject to the satisfaction of the Exclusive Special Excise Judge‑I, Saharsa.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to persons charged under sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
  • Whether the alleged procedural lapse (non‑compliance with Section 105 of the BNSS) in the seizure process warrants bail.
  • Whether the petitioners' lack of possession of the seized article and clean antecedents justify bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • seizure
  • procedural lapse
  • criminal antecedent
  • regular bail
  • excise law

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24761 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2026 Thana- Banma Itahari District- Saharsa
                 ======================================================
           1.     Ajay Kumar Son of Sri Kishori Yadav @ Kishore Yadav Resident of
                  Village- Hindupur/Hindhupur, Ward No.7, P.S.- Simri Bakhtiyarpur,
                  District- Saharsa
           2.    Haribol Kumar @ Haribol Yadav Son of Sri Kailash Yadav Resident of
                 Village- Dhav Ward No.9, P.S.- Simri Bakhtiyarpur, District- Saharsa

                                                                                      ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :         Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :         Mr. Pronoti Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   16-04-2026                       Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

                   learned APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a

                   case registered for the offence punishable under sections 30(a)

                   and 41 of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution is that from a vehicle,

                   altogether 107.3 liters of wiscuf cough syrup was recovered.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

                   petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence.

                   Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that

                   petitioners are merely sitting on that vehicle. Nothing has been

                   recovered from their possession. The witnesses of the seizure
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24761 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026
                                                        2/2




                      list are police personnel and police has not followed Section 105

                      of BNSS while preparing the seizure list. A statement has been

                      made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioners have got no

                      criminal antecedent. Moreover, they are languishing in judicial

                      custody since 03.02.2026.

                                   5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed

                      the prayer of regular bail.

                                   6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                      considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is

                      inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named

                      petitioners are directed to be released on bail in connection with

                      Banma Ithari P.S. Case No. 20 of 2026 on furnishing bail bond

                      of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like

                      amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special

                      Excise Judge-I, Saharsa.



                                            (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Shubham/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.