Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rajesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to specified conditions.

Summary

Petitioner Rajesh Kumar applied for bail in a case registered under Section 317(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. The prosecution’s case is based solely on a confessional statement of co‑accused Dheeraj Kumar, who named the petitioner after being apprehended with 171 litres of illicit Nepali liquor. The petitioner contended that he had no possession of the liquor, the motorcycle used did not belong to him, and that he was falsely implicated. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offences. The Court, after considering the submissions, granted bail on a cash bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, imposing conditions such as cooperation with the trial, attendance requirements, and restrictions against tampering with evidence or witnesses.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriateness of granting bail in offences punishable under Section 317(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 given the facts of the case?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • Section 317
  • prohibition and excise
  • confessional statement
  • evidence
  • court conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24877 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-474 Year-2024 Thana- GHORASAHAN District- East
                                                       Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Rajesh Kumar, Son of Amiri Sah, Resident of Village- Nanaura (Nonaura),
                 P.S.- Ghorasahan, District- East Champran. (In the impugned order, the father
                 name of the petitioner has been mentioned as not known due to typing
                 mistake)

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   16-04-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Ghorasahan P.S. Case No. 474 of 2024 dated 28.12.2024

                   registered for the offence punishable under Section 317(5) of the

                   Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and under Sections 30(a) and

                   41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act,

                   2022.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, on secret information,

                   on 28.12.2024 co-accused Dheeraj Kumar was apprehended

                   while trying to escape after seeing the police and later he

                   disclosed the name of the petitioner, who fled away from the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24877 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026
                                            2/3




          place of occurrence. On search 171 litres country made Nepali

          liquor was recovered from the sacks kept on motorcycle.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this

          case. It is submitted that nothing has been recovered from the

          conscious possession of the petitioner. Only on the confessional

          statement of co-accused Dheeraj Kumar, the petitioner has been

          made accused in this case. The motorcycle used in the said

          crime does not belong to the petitioner. The petitioner is in

          custody since 17.02.2026, having one criminal case against him

          and charge-sheet has been submitted in the case.

                       5. Learned A.P.P for the State opposes the prayer for

          bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of

          the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let

          the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of

          Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

          each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Excise

          Court No. 03, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with

          Ghorasahan P.S. Case No. 474 of 2024, subject to the following

          conditions:-

                                  1. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and
                          shall be properly represented on each and every
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24877 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026
                                                        3/3




                                      date fixed by the Court and on his absence on two
                                      consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail
                                      bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                                               2. One of the bailors will be his own blood
                                      relation, preferably father, mother, brother, sister
                                      and or his wife.

                                               3. The bailor shall also state on affidavit that
                                      he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner
                                      is made accused in any other case of similar nature
                                      after his release in the present case and thereafter
                                      the court below will be at liberty to initiate the
                                      proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of
                                      misuse.

                                               4. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence
                                      or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will
                                      be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

                                               5. The petitioner within two weeks of his
                                      release from custody shall appear before the S.H.O.
                                      of his local area alongwith a copy of this order and
                                      shall appear every fortnightly to mark his
                                      attendance till the framing of charge in the trial
                                      court.



                                                   (Khatim Reza, J)
prabhat/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.