Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Dipak Yadav @ Deepak YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to bond, sureties and a condition for possible cancellation.

Summary

Dipak Yadav applied for anticipatory bail in an excise case (PS No.55/2026) under sections 30(a) and 44 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, after a raid recovered 86.4 litres of IMFL and a co‑accused identified him as the person who escaped. The petitioner argued that he was falsely implicated, no incriminating article was found in his possession, and he has no prior criminal record. The State opposed the bail, relying on the co‑accused’s statement. The High Court, noting the absence of any seized material from the petitioner and that he had not been arrested, granted anticipatory bail subject to a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties, and a condition that bail may be cancelled if a prior offence under the Act is later discovered. The order directs the petitioner to surrender within four weeks if arrested.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted when the only evidence is a co‑accused’s statement and no material has been seized from the petitioner.
  • Whether the petitioner poses a risk of fleeing, tampering with evidence, or committing further offences under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • excise law
  • false implication
  • co‑accused statement
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24926 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-55 Year-2026 Thana- EXCISE MAHARAJGANJ District-
                                                         Siwan
                 ======================================================
                 Dipak Yadav @ Deepak Yadav S/o Dhanej Yadav Resident of Village - Siraj
                 Indauli, Ward No. 14, P.S. - Jamo Bazar, District - Siwan

                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Md. Anzarul Haque Sahara, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   22-04-2026                    1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

                                2. The petitioner has preferred this application for

                   grant of anticipatory bail apprehending his arrest in connection

                   with Excise Maharajganj P.S. Case no. 55 of 2026, registered

                   under sections 30(a) and 44 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise

                   Act, 2016.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states

                   that    having      received     information     about     the     petitioner

                   accumulating liquor for sale, it is stated that a raid was

                   conducted. While an accused Vishal Kumar was arrested, one

                   another accused managed to escape taking benefit of darkness.

                   It is further stated that the accused who was caught disclosed the

                   name of the person who had managed to escape as the petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24926 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026
                                            2/3




          herein. A total of 86.4 litres of IMFL was recovered.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. Neither any

          incriminating article was recovered from the possession of the

          petitioner nor does he have any concern with the seized article

          or with the land in question. The only material against him is the

          statement of a co-accused made before police. The petitioner

          has no criminal antecedent.

                       5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by

          learned A.P.P. for the State.

                       6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

          taking into consideration the allegation against the petitioner in

          the F.I.R., the petitioner not having been arrested at the spot and

          no incriminating article having been recovered from his

          possession, it is directed that the petitioner above named, in the

          event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below

          within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in

          connection with Excise Maharajganj P.S. Case no. 55 of 2026

          on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)

          with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

          the learned Special Judge, (Excise) Court no.2, Siwan on the

          following condition :
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24926 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026
                                                         3/3




                                    (I) If it subsequently transpires that the petitioner has

                       an antecedent under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016,

                       the prosecution will be at liberty to move this Court for

                       cancellation of bail granted to the petitioner.



                                                   (Partha Sarthy, J)
Shiv/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.