Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Dharmendra PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to specified conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Dharmendra Paswan, was implicated in the seizure of 200 litres of illicit country-made liquor from a tempo, after the driver of the vehicle identified him as the owner. He argued that he had no possession of the liquor, was not arrested on the spot, and that the seized vehicle and liquor did not belong to him, seeking bail. The State opposed the bail application. The court examined the facts, the seriousness of the offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, and the petitioner’s custody since February 2026, and decided to grant bail with stringent conditions, including surety bonds, regular court appearances, and restrictions on tampering with evidence. The order also stipulated that a blood relative must act as one of the bailors and that failure to appear could lead to cancellation of bail. The bail was thus granted subject to these conditions.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
  • Whether the circumstances of the seizure and the petitioner's alleged involvement justify denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise
  • illicit liquor
  • Section 30(a)
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • criminal procedure
  • false implication

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24942 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2957 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Dharmendra Paswan, Son of Vinod Paswan, R/o village Bariyarpur, P.S.-
                 Chhatauni, Dist.- East Champaran
                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Dhannjay Kumar II, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   16-04-2026                      Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Trial No. 147 of 2026 arising out of Excise P.S. Case No.

                   2957 of 2025 dated 31.12.2025 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and

                   Excise Act, 2016.

                                3. The allegation is of recovery of 200 litres

                   country made liquor from a Tempo bearing Registration No.

                   BR05PB-8904. One person was arrested on the spot,

                   claiming to be driver of the said Tempo, who disclosed the

                   name of the petitioner.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24942 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026
                                            2/3




          this case. It is submitted that nothing has been recovered

          from conscious possession of the petitioner. He has not been

          arrested on the spot. It is further submitted that the driver of

          the said Tempo was apprehended on the spot, who disclosed

          the name of the petitioner. Further, it is submitted that the

          seized Tempo and illicit liquor does not belong to the

          petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 06.02.2026,

          having five criminal cases against him and charge-sheet has

          been submitted in the case.

                       5. Learned A.P.P for the State opposes the prayer

          for bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Having considered the facts and circumstances

          of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the

          parties, let the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing

          bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties

          of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

          Special Excise Court No. 2, East Champaran at Motihari in

          connection with Trial No. 147 of 2026 arising out of Excise

          P.S. Case No. 2957 of 2025, subject to the following

          conditions:-

                                  1. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24942 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026
                                                        3/3




                                      shall be properly represented on each and every
                                      date fixed by the Court and on his absence on two
                                      consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail
                                      bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                                               2. One of the bailors will be his own blood
                                      relation, preferably father, mother, brother, sister
                                      and or his wife.

                                               3. The bailor shall also state on affidavit that
                                      he will inform the court concerned if the petitioner
                                      is made accused in any other case of similar nature
                                      after his release in the present case and thereafter
                                      the court below will be at liberty to initiate the
                                      proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of
                                      misuse.

                                               4. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence
                                      or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will
                                      be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

                                               5. The petitioner within two weeks of his
                                      release from custody shall appear before the S.H.O.
                                      of his local area alongwith a copy of this order and
                                      shall appear every fortnightly to mark his
                                      attendance till the framing of charge in the trial
                                      court.



                                                   (Khatim Reza, J)
prabhat/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.