Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kamlesh SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioners, finding no substantive material to justify their continued detention.

Summary

The petitioners, Kamlesh Singh and Amit Kumar, sought bail fearing arrest in a case (Hisua PS No. 59 of 2026) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly selling illicit country-made mahua liquor. Police had raided a low‑land area, recovered 285 litres of liquor and identified the petitioners as participants based on villagers' statements, though no liquor or other incriminating material was found on them. The petitioners contended they were falsely implicated due to village enmity and highlighted their clean (or minimal) antecedents. The State argued that one petitioner had a prior similar case. The Court, noting the absence of substantive evidence linking the petitioners to the recovery, exercised its inherent powers under Section 482(2) of the CrPC and ordered their release on bail with a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties, subject to conditions of appearance before the trial court.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioners can be granted bail in the absence of material evidence establishing their participation in the alleged offence under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Section 30
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Section 482
  • Criminal Procedure
  • illicit liquor
  • Nawada
  • Hisua

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24943 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-59 Year-2026 Thana- HISUWA District- Nawada
                 ======================================================
           1.     Kamlesh Singh son of Late Saket Singh, Resident of Village -Barhauna, PS-
                  Hisua, Distt- Nawada.
           2.     Amit Kumar @ Ritesh Singh @ Ritesh Kumar son of Balmiki Singh,
                  Resident of Village -Barhauna, PS- Hisua, Distt- Nawada.
                                                                              ... ... Petitioners
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                        ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioners       :      Mr. Vibhuti Ranjan Sonvadra, Advocate
                 For the State             :      Mr. Bishweshwar Ram, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   24-04-2026                         Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                       2. In the present case, the petitioners are

                   apprehending their arrest in connection with Hisua P.S. Case

                   No. 59 of 2026, dated 03.02.2026, registered for the offence

                   punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and

                   Excise Act.

                                       3. As per prosecution case, police received

                   information about petitioners and co-accused Bablu selling

                   illicit country made mahua liquor near a ‘paien’ (lowland). A

                   raid was conducted and three persons fled away from the spot

                   on seeing the police party. From search of the premises, recovery

                   of 285 litres of illicit country made liquor was made . The villagers
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24943 of 2026(2) dt.24-04-2026
                                            2/3




          disclosed the name of the petitioners and other co-accused who

          made good their escape.

                          4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

          the petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been

          implicated in this case. Nothing incriminating has been

          recovered from the persons or possession of the petitioners, who

          have been named in this case due to enmity of the villagers.

          Furthermore, the recovery has been made from an open place

          which is accessible to one and all. Petitioner no. 1 is having

          clean antecedent while petitioner no. 2 is having antecedent of

          one case.

                          5. Learned APP opposes the submissions made on

          behalf of the petitioners and submits that petitioner no. 2 is

          having antecedent of one case which is of similar nature.

                          6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and

          submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the

          fact that no recovery has been shown from the petitioners and

          further considering the absence of substantive material to show

          their complicity in the alleged offence, let the petitioners, above-

          named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court

          concerned within a period of eight weeks from today, be

          released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24943 of 2026(2) dt.24-04-2026
                                                      3/3




                    (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like

                    amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special

                    Excise Court-I, Nawada, in connection with Hisua P.S. Case

                    No. 59 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under

                    Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. and other following conditions:

                                    (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the

                    petitioners.

                                    (ii) The petitioners will remain present on each and

                    every date fixed by the Court below, if so required by the

                    learned trial Court.


                                                                (Arun Kumar Jha, J)

Shahnawaz/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.