Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shatrudhan PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

In the absence of any material establishing the petitioner’s complicity, the court granted bail under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

Summary

The petitioner, Shatrudhan Paswan, sought bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly selling illicit liquor. The prosecution’s case was based on secret information and the identification of the petitioner by a local chowkidar, but no liquor or other incriminating material was recovered from him. The petitioner argued that he was falsely implicated, had no involvement with the recovered liquor, and possessed a clean antecedent. The State opposed the bail application. Considering the lack of material linking the petitioner to the offence, the court ordered his release on bail subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. and a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner can be denied bail in the absence of any material linking him to the alleged offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
  • Whether the petitioner is a victim of false implication warranting bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • false implication
  • illicit liquor
  • Section 30
  • Section 482
  • Criminal Procedure
  • Prohibition law

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24949 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-275 Year-2025 Thana- PANDAUL District- Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Shatrudhan Paswan S/o- Late Satto Paswan @ Santo Paswan, R/o Vill-
                 Salempur, P.S- Pandaul, District -Madhubani.
                                                                        ... ... Petitioner
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                 ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner        :      Ms. Kumari Pallavi, Advocate
                 For the State             :      Ms. Pushpa Sinha.1, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   24-04-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                      2.   In   the   present     case,    the     petitioner       is

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Pandaul P.S. Case

                   No. 275 of 2025, dated 07.12.2025, registered for the offence

                   punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and

                   Excise Act.

                                      3. As per prosecution case, during patrolling duty

                   the police received secret information about the petitioner and

                   other co-accused persons selling illicit liquor after storing the

                   same in an orchard. A raid was conducted, but the miscreants

                   fled away from the spot and recovery of 31 litres of illicit

                   country made chulai liquor was made. The name of the

                   petitioner was disclosed by the local chowkidar.

                                      4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24949 of 2026(2) dt.24-04-2026
                                            2/3




          the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this

          case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the person

          or possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern

          either with the allegedly recovered liquor or with the place from

          where the said recovery has been made. The name of the

          petitioner sprung up in the present case on the basis of

          disclosure made by local chowkidar and petitioner is a victim of

          false implication. Learned counsel lastly submits that petitioner

          is having clean antecedent.

                          5. Learned APP opposes the submissions made on

          behalf of the petitioner.

                          6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and

          submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the

          fact that no recovery has been shown from the petitioner and

          further considering the absence of material to show the

          complicity of the petitioner in the said occurrence, let the

          petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender

          before the Court concerned within a period of eight weeks from

          today, be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.

          10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the

          like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special

          Judge, Excise, Madhubani, in connection with Pandaul P.S.
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24949 of 2026(2) dt.24-04-2026
                                                      3/3




                    Case No. 275 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down

                    under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. and other following

                    conditions:

                                    (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the

                    petitioner.

                                    (ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and

                    every date fixed by the Court below, if so required by the

                    learned trial Court.


                                                                (Arun Kumar Jha, J)

Shahnawaz/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.