Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Santosh PatelversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

Bail is granted to the petitioner subject to a bond and conditions.

Summary

The petitioner, Santosh Patel, applied for bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act for the alleged seizure of 135 litres of spirit from his bike. He contended that he was falsely implicated, that no contraband was found in his possession, and that the police failed to comply with Section 105 of the BNSS while making the seizure. The State opposed bail, citing three prior similar offences against the petitioner. After hearing both sides, the Court considered the procedural lapse and the petitioner’s claim of innocence, and decided to grant bail subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and a condition that he not commit similar offences in the future. The bail order was directed to be executed before the Special Judge, Excise‑II, Aurangabad.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act considering alleged procedural irregularities in the seizure.
  • Whether the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedents justify denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise law
  • prohibition act
  • seizure procedure
  • criminal antecedent
  • Section 30(a)
  • Section 105

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24974 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2026 Thana- NARALI KALA KHURD District-
                                                       Aurangabad
                 ======================================================
                 Santosh Patel S/o Jitendra Singh R/o Village- Amba, Meh, P.S- Narari Kala
                 Khurd, Dist- Aurangabad.
                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                     ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mrs. Rupa Kumari, Advocate.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Meena Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   12-05-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection

                   with Narari Kala Khurd P.S. Case No. 33 of 2026 registered for

                   the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar

                   Prohibition & Excise Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from a

                   bike, altogether 135 liters of spirit was recovered.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

                   committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

                   case. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the

                   petitioner. The witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel

                   and the police has not complied with Section 105 of the BNSS
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24974 of 2026(3) dt.12-05-2026
                                                       2/2




                     while making the seizure. He further submits that the petitioner

                     is the owner of the said bike and from perusal of the seizure list,

                     it will transpire that the seizure has been made from one

                     Ramesh Sharma and the petitioner. Moreover, the petitioner is

                     languishing in judicial custody since 13.02.2026.

                                  5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                     for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal

                     antecedent of three cases of similar nature.

                                  6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                     considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                     inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with the condition

                     that the petitioner shall not indulge himself in similar nature

                     of offences in future. The above named petitioner is directed to

                     be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs.

                     ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to

                     the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, Excise-II,

                     Aurangabad, Bihar in connection with Narari Kala Khurd P.S.

                     Case No. 33 of 2026.


                                                    (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.