Patna High Court
Amarjeet @ Indrajeet Yadav @ Inarjit YadavversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
The bail application was dismissed, and the petitioner was not granted bail.
Summary
The petitioners, named Amarjeet, Indrajeet and Inarjit Yadav, challenged their inclusion in an FIR that incorrectly recorded their father's name. They were charged under Sections 191(3), 190, 126(2), 109, 352 of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing at a victim. The petitioners sought regular bail, claiming false implication, lack of prior criminal record, and willingness to cooperate with the trial, having been in custody since 2 October 2025. The State and the informant opposed the bail application. The Patna High Court, after hearing counsel, declined to grant bail, finding the circumstances insufficient for release, and dismissed the bail application.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail for offences under Sections 191(3), 190, 126(2), 109, 352 of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act
- Whether the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the FIR
- Whether the seriousness of the alleged offences justifies denial of bail
Legislation cited
Subjects
- bail
- false implication
- criminal procedure
- Arms Act
- Sections 191 190 126 109 352
- Bihar High Court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2507 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-125 Year-2025 Thana- LAUKAHI District- Madhubani
======================================================
Amarjeet @ Indrajeet Yadav @ Inarjit Yadav S/O Ramadhin Yadav Wrongly
mentioned in the F.I.R father nameRam Ashish Yadav R/o village - Hanuman
Nagar , p.s- Phulparas , District Madhubnai
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ravi Prakash, Advocate
For the State : Mr.Tapeshwar Sharma, APP
For the Informant : Mr.Pravashankar Mishra, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
3 31-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned
counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public
Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with
Laukahi P.S. Case No. 125/2025 registered for the offences
punishable under Sections 191(3), 190, 126(2), 109, 352 of
B.N.S. and Section 27 of Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner is alleged to
have fired upon the victim which hit the victim.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case. Learned
counsel further submits that he has no criminal antecedent and
he is in custody since 02.10.2025. The petitioner undertakes to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2507 of 2026(3) dt.31-03-2026
2/2
co-operate in the case/ trial.
5. Learned counsel for the informant as well as
learned APP for the State have jointly opposed the prayer for
regular bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts, this Court is not
inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
tusharika/-
U T
Checking your session…