Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bhimbali @ Bhimbali Mishra @ Bhimbali KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The Court denied regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner was arrested after the SSB intercepted a motorcycle carrying 53.068 kg of charas, and he was identified as the individual who fled the scene. He has been in custody since 28-10-2025 and filed an application for regular bail under the NDPS Act. The prosecution opposed the bail, emphasizing the large quantity of narcotics recovered and the petitioner's alleged role in transporting the charas. The Court examined the submissions and the case record, concluding that the seriousness of the offence warranted denial of regular bail. Consequently, the bail application was rejected, with a direction to the prosecution to expedite the trial and a provision that the petitioner may seek bail again if the trial is unduly delayed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail despite alleged involvement in the transportation of a large quantity of charas under the NDPS Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • NDPS Act
  • charas
  • drug trafficking
  • high court
  • bail denial

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25070 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-73 Year-2025 Thana- PURUSHOTTAMPUR District- West
                                                        Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Bhimbali @ Bhimbali Mishra @ Bhimbali Kumar Son of Sheetal Mishra
                 Resident of Village- Ratanmala Mishra Tola, P.S.- Majhauliya, District- West
                 Champaran

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Amarendra Nath Verma
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Ms. Pushpa Sinha.1
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   16-04-2026                  Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

                   Purshottampur P.S. Case No. 73 of 2025 registered for the

                   offence under Sections 20(b)(ii)(c), 23(c) and 29 of the NDPS

                   Act.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, 53.068 kg of Charas

                   was recovered by the SSB when they intercepted a motorcycle

                   being driven by one Chotu Sah. After the SSB personnel

                   stopped the motorcycle, one person fled away, who is said to be

                   the present petitioner.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence.
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25070 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026
                                                        2/2




                      Petitioner is in custody since 28.10.2025.

                                   5. Learned counsel for the State vehemently opposes

                      the bail application.

                                   6. I have considered the submissions of the parties and

                      have gone through the records of the case. Since there is a huge

                      recovery and the petitioner has been found to be involved in the

                      transportation of Charas, this Court is not inclined to grant

                      regular bail to the petitioner.

                                   7. Accordingly, this application for regular bail stands

                      rejected. However, if the trial is delayed by the prosecution, the

                      petitioner may renew his prayer for bail. The prosecution is

                      directed to expedite the trial.

                                   8. It is made clear that any observation made herein is

                      prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of

                      adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations

                      shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case

                      and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any

                      manner.



                                                              (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Shishir/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.