Patna High Court
Dashrath SahniversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
Bail is granted to the petitioner subject to bond, sureties, verification of antecedent, and monthly police attendance.
Summary
The petitioner, Dashrath Sahni, was arrested for possession of 10.44 litres of illicit liquor, alleged to be an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He claimed a clean antecedent and asserted that he was falsely implicated. The State opposed his bail application. The High Court, after considering the facts and the petitioner's clean record, ordered his release on bail upon furnishing a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, subject to verification of his antecedent and monthly police attendance. The court clarified that the order is limited to the bail application and does not prejudice the trial. The bail bonds may be cancelled if the petitioner fails to appear as directed.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act considering the nature of the offence and the petitioner’s clean antecedent.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act — s. 30(a)
Subjects
- bail
- excise
- illicit liquor
- Section 30(a)
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
- clean antecedent
- court conditions
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25131 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-52 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Saran
======================================================
Dashrath Sahni Son of Sukan Sahni Resident of Village- Jugauliya (Rupani),
P.O.- Rupani, P.S.- Madhuban, District- East Champaran at Motihari (Bihar)
845420
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Jeetendra Narayan
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anil Prasad Singh
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 16-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Excise
Thana (Saran @ Sadar Excise P.S. Case No. 52 of 2026
registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the
Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, there is recovery of
10.44 litres of illicit liquor from the possession of the petitioner
who claims clean antecedent.
4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the
petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been
implicated in this case. The petitioner is in custody since
24.02.2026 having clean antecedent.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25131 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026
2/3
5. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the
prayer for bail of the petitioners.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case
and submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners, let the
petitioner, above named, be released on bail upon furnishing
bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the
like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional
Sessions Judge-cum-Presiding Officr, Exclusive Special Court
Excise Court No.-3, Saran at Chapra /concerned Court below in
connection with Excise Thana (Saran) @ Sadar Excise P.S. Case
No. 52 of 2026.
7. As the petitioner claims to have clean antecedent,
the Court below, before accepting the bail bonds of the
petitioner is directed to verify the antecedent of the petitioner. If
the petitioner is found to be involved in any other case then the
bail bonds of the petitioner shall not be accepted.
8. As a condition of this order, the petitioner after
being released on bail is directed to mark their attendance at
Madhuban P.S., East Chamapran at Motihari on first Sunday of
each month. Any default in appearance at the police station will
result in cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner.
9. It is, however, clarified that the observations made
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25131 of 2026(2) dt.16-04-2026
3/3
herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail
application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioners at
any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not express
any opinion on the merits of the case.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
sanjeev/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.