Patna High Court
Aman SinghversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
The bail application was dismissed, denying the petitioner relief.
Summary
Aman Singh applied for bail in a criminal case (Sasaram (M) P.S. Case No. 314 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351, 61(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Penal Code. The prosecution alleges that unknown criminals injured a person and looted Rs. 9,000, a mobile phone and certificates, and that the petitioner participated in the loot. The petitioner contends he is innocent and was falsely implicated due to a land dispute. The court examined the seriousness of the allegations and the evidence presented. Finding the allegations substantial, the court declined to grant bail and dismissed the application.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner given the nature of the offences alleged
- Whether the petitioner’s claim of false implication due to a land dispute warrants bail
Subjects
- bail
- criminal procedure
- false implication
- land dispute
- theft
- assault
- Indian Penal Code
- Bihar
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2523 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-314 Year-2025 Thana- SASARAM MUFFSIL District- Rohtas
======================================================
Aman Singh Son of Late Ajay Singh Resident of Village- Durgapur, P.S.-
Karwandiya, District- Rohtas
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sudama Singh
Mr.Shashi Kant
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nand Kishore Prasad
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
3 25-03-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with
Sasaram (M) P.S. Case No. 314 of 2025 registered for the
offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 351,
61(2) and 3(5) of the BNS.
3. As per the prosecution case, unknown criminals are
said to have injured one person and have committed loot of Rs.
9000, one mobile phone and certificates. The petitioner is in
custody since 22.09.2025 and it has come during investigation
that he has participated in the loot.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this
case because of land dispute and there is no allegation against
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2523 of 2026(3) dt.25-03-2026
2/2
the petitioner.
5. Considering the nature of allegation levelled
against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to
the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
Vikas/-
U
Checking your session…