Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kaif Ansari @ Kaif KhatarnakversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court held that bail should be granted to the petitioner subject to strict conditions, despite the evidentiary limitations.

Summary

The petitioner, Kaif Ansari, was arrested in connection with a robbery case (Section 392 IPC) based on a FIR filed in 2022. The FIR did not name him; his alleged involvement emerged solely from the confessional statement of a co-accused, Pradeep Giri, and no material evidence was recovered from his possession. The petitioner sought bail, arguing the lack of direct evidence and that other co-accused had already been granted bail. The State opposed bail, noting the petitioner’s involvement in another case, though he was already on bail for that matter. The Court, after considering the circumstances, granted bail on a cash bond and sureties, imposing conditions regarding cooperation with the trial, attendance, and non‑tampering with evidence or witnesses.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted when the accused is not named in the FIR and the only incriminating material is a co-accused's confessional statement.
  • Whether the absence of seized material and lack of TIP affect the bail decision.
  • Whether the petitioner’s involvement in another case influences the grant of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • robbery
  • Section 392 IPC
  • confessional statement
  • co-accused
  • evidence
  • anticipatory bail
  • criminal antecedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25260 of 2026
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-114 Year-2022 Thana- PIPRAKOTHI District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Kaif Ansari @ Kaif Khatarnak S/O Soaib Ansari @ Soaib Miyan R/O Village-
                 Jhadwa, P.S- Harsidhi, Distt.- East Champaran, Motihari.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Rajesh Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Anil Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   01-05-2026                    Heard Mr.Rajesh Kumar, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner and Mr.Anil Kumar, learned Additional Public

                   Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since

                   27.01.2026 in connection with Pipra Kothi P.S. Case No. 114 of

                   2022, F.I.R. dated 20.04.2022 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Section 392 of IPC.

                                3. According to the FIR the prosecution case in brief

                   is that the informant Digvijay Narayan has given a written

                   petition before SHO Piprakothi P.S and stated therein that the

                   informant Digvijay Narayan is the owner of truck bearing

                   registration No. UP84T 9354 ten tons of iron rod for its delivery

                   moved for Motihari. It has further alleged that some person

                   looted the truck by kidnapping the driver and Khalashi and left
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25260 of 2026(3) dt.01-05-2026
                                            2/4




          the truck in the territorial jurisdiction of Sabebganj PS. It has

          further alleged that the informant came to know about the truck

          being taken in wrong direction by the G.P.S. chip, then he

          informed the S.HO. Sahebganj on his CUG number and then the

          truck was recovered. It has further alleged that the loaded iron

          rods were not found on the truck so the informant has raised

          suspicion against the driver and Khalashi of the truck.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          petitioner is not named in the FIR. The name of the petitioner

          has been transpired during investigation on the basis of the

          confessional statement of co-accused person, namely, Pradeep

          Giri @ Dhananjay Giri and nothing has been recovered from

          conscious possession of the petitioner and till date no TIP has

          been conducted by the prosecution and co-accused person,

          namely, Pradeep Giri @ Dhananjay Giri, who has confessed the

          name of the petitioner, has been granted bail by this Court vide

          order dated 09.05.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No.9828 of 2023,

          and several other co-accused persons have also been granted

          anticipatory bail/regular bail by different Coordinate Benches of

          this Hon’ble Court and the police, after investigation, submitted

          the chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in

          custody since 27.01.2026 .
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25260 of 2026(3) dt.01-05-2026
                                            3/4




                       5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the

          petitioner carries one more case other than the present one but

          fairly submits that the petitioner is on bail in the said case, as

          mentioned in para-3 of the bail petition.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner,

          above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of

          Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

          each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,

          Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Pipra Kothi P.S.

          Case No. 114 of 2022, with the following conditions:-

                       (I) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

          properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court

          and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and

          on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

          reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

                       (II) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

          witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move

          for cancellation of bail.

                       (III) And, further condition that the court below shall

          verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

          any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25260 of 2026(3) dt.01-05-2026
                                                           4/4




                         criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for

                         cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the

                         acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                         shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                         verification.



                                                (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Nitesh/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.