Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Prakash Mandal @ Prakash KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties.

Summary

The petitioner, Prakash Mandal, sought bail in a case where 15 kg of ganja was seized from an auto he owned and drove. The prosecution alleged that the seized narcotics were linked to him, while the petitioner claimed he was merely a driver and had no possession of the contraband, asserting that the seizure was not made in compliance with Section 105 of the BNSS Act. He also highlighted his lack of criminal antecedents and his custody since 23 January 2026. The State opposed the bail, citing the large quantity of drugs involved. After hearing both sides, the Court found merit in the petitioner's arguments and ordered his release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, directing compliance with the Sessions Judge‑cumm‑Special Judge, NDPS Act, Araria.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail can be granted in an NDPS case involving a large quantity of narcotics (15 kg) and alleged procedural lapses in seizure.
  • Whether the petitioner’s role as owner‑driver without possession of the seized contraband warrants bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • drug trafficking
  • seizure procedure
  • Section 105
  • large quantity narcotics
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25545 of 2026
                          Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2026 Thana- Bathnaha District- Araria
                 ======================================================
                 Prakash Mandal @ Prakash Kumar S/o Jogeshwar Mandal Resident of
                 Village- Bathnaha Mandal Tola, Ward No. 14, P.S.- Bathnaha, District- Araria



                                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                          Versus
                 The State of Bihar



                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :          Mr. Vijay Kishore Bharti, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :          Mr. Binod Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   18-04-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection

                   with Bathnaha P.S. Case No. 12 of 2026 registered for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 8/20(b)(ii)(B) of the N.D.P.S.

                   Act.

                                 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that

                   altogether 15 kg of ganja were recovered from an auto and the

                   petitioner is owner-cum-driver of the auto.

                                 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has

                   committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25545 of 2026(2) dt.18-04-2026
                                            2/3




          case. He also submits that from perusal of the FIR, it is clear

          that the petitioner was carrying the contraband with one Manoj

          Das and for that he was to be paid Rs. 2,000/-. He also submits

          that the petitioner is not concerned in any way with the alleged

          ganja. He further submits that nothing has been recovered from

          the possession of the petitioner. The witnesses of the seizure list

          are police personnel and the police has not complied with

          Section 105 of the BNSS while making the seizure. He further

          submits that the alleged recovery of contraband is though more

          than small quantity but is much less than commercial quantity.

          Moreover, a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition

          that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing

          in judicial custody since 23.01.2026.

                       5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

          for the State.

                       6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

          considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

          inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

          petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

          bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

          of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

          Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, NDPS Act, Araria in
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25545 of 2026(2) dt.18-04-2026
                                                       3/3




                     connection with Bathnaha P.S. Case No. 12 of 2026.



                                                    (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.