Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sankit Yadav @ Sankit Kumar @ Tena YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court allowed the withdrawal of the application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Sankit Yadav, filed an application before the Patna High Court in a criminal miscellaneous case. During the pendency of the application, the petitioner was apprehended, prompting his counsel to seek permission to withdraw the application. The court granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the application was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the original application were addressed. The order was pronounced by Justice Soni Shrivastava.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw the pending application and have it dismissed?

Subjects

  • withdrawal of application
  • criminal procedure
  • dismissal as withdrawn

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25638 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2025 Thana- SAMHO District- Begusarai
                  ======================================================
                  Sankit Yadav @ Sankit Kumar @ Tena Yadav Son of Lola yadav @ Lalan
                  yadav Resident of Village -Abgil Rampur (Husaina) PS -Mednichauki, Dist-
                  Lakhisarai

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Indrajit Kumar, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Kalyan Shankar, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    01-05-2026                      Mr. Harendra Kumar submits on behalf of Mr.

                    Indrajit Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner that during the

                    pendency of this application, the petitioner has already been

                    apprehended, as such, this application has become infructuous.

                    Therefore, he seeks permission to withdraw the present

                    application.

                                 2. Permission is accorded.

                                 3. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as

                    withdrawn.



                                               (Soni Shrivastava, J)
anand/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.