Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pramod Kumar @ Pramod Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Petitioner Pramod Kumar Mahto was arrested in connection with a kidnapping and ransom case (PS 704 of 2025) alleged under Sections 310(4), 310(5) of the BNS and Sections 25(1‑b) a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution claimed he participated in the abduction of Parbindra Paswan and demanded a ransom of Rs. three lakhs. The petitioner contended he was falsely implicated, had no criminal antecedent, and that the money recovered from his house belonged to him; the victim’s statement did not name any accused. He had been in judicial custody since 21‑10‑2025. After hearing both sides, the court considered the facts, the length of custody, and the lack of incriminating evidence, and decided to grant bail on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties. The order directed the petitioner to appear before the 1st class judicial magistrate with the bail conditions.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in a kidnapping and arms‑related offence given the seriousness of the charges and the period of pre‑trial detention.

Legislation cited

  • Arms Act — s. 25(1-b) a, 26, 35
  • BNS — s. 310(4), 310(5)

Subjects

  • bail
  • kidnapping
  • ransom
  • Arms Act
  • pre‑trial detention
  • judicial custody

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25724 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-704 Year-2025 Thana- MADHAURAH District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Pramod Kumar @ Pramod Kumar Mahto Son of Late Ram Naresh Mahto
                 Resident of Village- Piyar Purwa, P.S.- Marhawarh, District- Saran (Chhapra)
                                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                       ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Adesh Raj Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   19-06-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with

                   Marhawrah P.S. Case No. 704 of 2025 registered for the offence

                   punishable under Sections 310(4), 310(5) of BNS and 25(1-b) a,

                   26, 35 of Arms Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner

                   along with others has kidnapped one Parbindra Paswan and has

                   demanded Rs. three lakhs as ransom from his family members.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

                   has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no

                   offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned

                   counsel for the petitioner has submitted that from perusal of the

                   FIR, it will transpire that from the house of this petitioner,

                   altogether one lakh seventy two thousand and five hundred rupees
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25724 of 2026(3) dt.19-06-2026
                                                        2/2




                      was recovered. He has further been submitted that during course

                      of investigation Parbindra Paswan has given his statement and in

                      his statement, he has not named anybody rather he has stated that

                      he was kidnapped by all the persons and total two lakhs were

                      handed over to them. Regarding cash, he has further submitted

                      that the cash has been recovered from his house which is his own

                      money. A statement has been made in para-3 of the petition that

                      petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Moreover, he is languishing

                      in judicial custody since 21.10.2025.

                                   5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                      for the State.

                                   6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                      considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as

                      period of custody, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner

                      on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on

                      bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand

                      only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction

                      of the learned 1st class judicial, Magistrate, Saran in connection

                      with Marhawrah P.S. Case No. 704 of 2025.



                                            (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sneha/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.