Patna High Court

Angrahit Bind @ Angrahit BinversusThe State of Bihar

Decided: 18 April 2026
Disposal: ALLOWED
Bench: ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioners.

Summary

The petitioners, Angrahit Bind and Bhuar Bind, applied for regular bail in a case registered under several sections of the B.N.S. for alleged assault with intent to kill. The prosecution alleged that the petitioners, armed with weapons, attacked an informant and his associates, causing injuries. The petitioners contended they were innocent, the injuries were simple, they had no prior criminal record, and similar co‑accused had been granted bail in a recent case. The State opposed the bail application. After hearing both sides, the court found the petitioners' circumstances warranted bail and ordered them to be released on a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties each.

Issues considered

Whether the petitioners are entitled to regular bail despite charges under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 351(2), 351(3), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S.
Whether the nature of the alleged injuries and the petitioners' lack of criminal antecedents justify granting bail
Whether the precedent of bail granted to similarly situated co‑accused in Cr. Misc. No. 24523 of 2026 is applicable

Legislation cited

B.N.S. — s. 109, 115(2), 117(2), 126(2), 3(5), 351(2), 351(3), 352

Subjects

regular bail
criminal procedure
assault
weapon
false implication
judicial custody
precedent

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25815 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2026 Thana- BUXAR MUFFSIL District- Buxar
                 ======================================================
           1.     Angrahit Bind @ Angrahit Bin, S/O Buwa Bind @ Buwa Bin, R/O Village-
                  Jarigawa, P.S- Buxar Muffasil, Distt.- Buxar.
           2.    Bhuar Bind @ Bhuar Bin, S/O Late Timil Bind @ Late Timil Bin, R/O
                 Village- Jarigawa, P.S- Buxar Muffasil, Distt.- Buxar.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   18-04-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under Sections                   126(2),

                   115(2), 117(2), 109, 351(2), 351(3), 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the

                   petitioners along with other being armed with weapon arrived at

                   the door of the informant. They started assaulting with intention to

                   kill. Brijbihari Bin assaulted with farsa on the head of the

                   informant’s husband. It is alleged that petitioner no. 2 Bhuar Bind

                   assaulted Indrajit Bin and petitioner no.1 Angrahit Bind assaulted

                   the informant.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25815 of 2026(2) dt.18-04-2026
                                                         2/2




                       petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have

                       committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this

                       case. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that injury

                       of both the persons whom the petitioners have assaulted is simple

                       which is apparent from the order of the learned trial Court. It has

                       further been submitted that similarly situated co-accused persons

                       have been granted bail by learned Co-ordinate Bench of this Court

                       vide Cr. Misc. No. 24523 of 2026. Petitioners are having no

                       criminal antecedent and they are languishing in judicial custody

                       since 16.01.2026 and 19.01.2026.

                                    5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently

                       opposed the application for bail.

                                    6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                       considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                       inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named

                       petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

                       bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) each with two

                       sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                       Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in connection with Buxar

                       Muffasil P.S. Case No. 05 of 2026.


                                                            (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

lata/-
U        T

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…