Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Satyendra Yadav @ Satyendra Prasad @ Satyendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The application for regular bail was dismissed.

Summary

The petitioner, Satyendra Yadav, was arrested in connection with a FIR (Ghoshi P.S. Case No. 184 of 2024) alleging offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 379 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He has been in custody since 9 May 2024 and this is his second application for regular bail after a prior denial on 15 October 2025. The petitioner contended that he is innocent, that key witnesses such as the investigating officer and the treating doctor have not been examined for a year, and that the trial is delayed. The State opposed the bail, emphasizing the seriousness of the charges, including murder and firearm injury. The Court observed that the trial is on the verge of conclusion and therefore dismissed the bail application. The Superintendent of Police was directed to ensure the attendance of two witnesses within a month and to file a compliance report.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioner given the gravity of the offences and the stage of the trial

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • Indian Penal Code
  • Arms Act
  • murder
  • trial delay
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25816 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-184 Year-2024 Thana- GHOSI District- Jehanabad
                 ======================================================
                 Satyendra Yadav @ Satyendra Prasad @ Satyendra Kumar Son of Yogendra
                 Prasad RESIDENT OF VILLAGE -CHUNUKPUR, PO- BANDHUGANJ,
                 PS- GHOSHI, DISTRICT -JEHANABAD, BIHAR
                                                                        ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                 Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                 ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Ramakant Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-05-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the parties.

                                2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

                   Ghoshi P.S. Case No. 184 of 2024, registered for the offence

                   punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 379

                   and 504 of the Indian Penal Code and subsequently section 302

                   of the Indian Penal Code was added and section 27 of the Arms

                   Act.

                                3. This is the second attempt of bail of the petitioner.

                   Earlier, the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by this

                   Court vide order dated 15.10.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No.

                   35184 of 2025.

                                4. The petitioner is named in the FIR. There is

                   specific allegation against him of inflicting firearm injury in

                   abdomen of the deceased who died during course of the

                   treatement.

                                5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25816 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026
                                                        2/2




                      petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He further

                      submits that the I.O. and the doctor are not been examined for

                      the last one year and because of that the trial has been delayed.

                      The petitioner is in custody since 09.05.2024.

                                   6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer

                      for bail.

                                   7. Considering the fact that the trial is on the verge of

                      conclusion, this application is dismissed.

                                   8. The Superintendent of Police, Jehanabad is directed

                      to ensure the attendance of the two witnesses within next one

                      month and file a compliance report.

                                   9. It is made clear that any observation made herein is

                      prima facie in nature and limited solely for the purpose of

                      adjudication of the present bail application. Such observations

                      shall not be construed as an expression on the merits of the case

                      and shall not influence the trial or any other proceedings in any

                      manner.


                                                         (Sandeep Kumar, J)

Ranjeet/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.