Patna High Court
Ranjana Devi and AnrversusState Of Bihar and Anr
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioners' failure to appear.
Summary
Ranjana Devi and Pankaj Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No.25876 of 2016) before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and Jitendra Singh. The petition sought relief concerning a complaint case registered in Gaya. On 13 September 2023, the court noted that no counsel or party appeared on behalf of the petitioners despite repeated calls. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State was present. The bench held that the petition could not be entertained in the absence of the petitioners and therefore dismissed it for non‑prosecution. The order was pronounced by Justice Satyavrat Verma.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when petitioners fail to appear before the court despite being served notice?
Subjects
- non‑prosecution
- petition dismissed
- criminal miscellaneous
- court procedure
- absence of parties
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25876 of 2016
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1273 Year-2013 Thana- GAYA COMPLAINT CASE District-
Gaya
======================================================
1. Ranjana Devi wife of Pankaj Kumar
2. Pankaj Kumar, son of Muneshwar Prasad Both resident of Mohalla- Dakhin
Darwaja, P.S.- Civil Lines, District- Gaya, at present resident of New
Taridih, Bhagalpur, P.S.- Bodh Gaya, District- Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. Jitendra Singh, son of Sri Basudeo Singh resident of Village- Bhagwanpur,
Ward No.9, P.S.- Bodh Gaya, District- Gaya
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Yogendra Kumar Singh APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 13-09-2023 1. No one appears on behalf of the petitioners on
repeated calls.
2. Learned A.P.P. for the State is present.
3. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-
U T
Checking your session…