Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Prabhawati DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties, with conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and Section 482(2) B.N.S. Act.

Summary

The petitioner, a 65‑year‑old mother‑in‑law, sought anticipatory bail in a dowry‑death case (Charpokhari P.S. Case No. 209 of 2025) where she was alleged to have participated in the killing of the informant’s daughter under Sections 80(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner, along with other accused, killed the victim for non‑payment of dowry, while the petitioner contended she had no involvement in the day‑to‑day affairs of the deceased and that the death was due to asphyxia by hanging, as per the post‑mortem report. The husband of the deceased, identified as the primary accused, had already surrendered and was in custody. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the bail, but the court considered the petitioner’s advanced age, lack of direct involvement, and the fact that the principal accused was already detained. Accordingly, the court ordered anticipatory bail on the condition of a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties and compliance with Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and Section 482(2) of the B.N.S. Act.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in view of the allegations under the B.N.S. Act.
  • Whether the petitioner’s age, relationship to the deceased, and the surrender of the primary accused justify granting bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • dowry death
  • Bihar Narcotic Substances Act
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • mother‑in‑law
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25906 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-209 Year-2025 Thana- CHARPOKHARI District- Bhojpur
                 ======================================================
                 Prabhawati Devi W/O Yougal Yadav R/O Village- Dhandhauli, P.S.-
                 Charpokhari, District- Bhojpur.                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                 Versus
                 The State of Bihar                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :        Mr. Sunny Kumar, Advocate
                 For the State          :        Md. Matloob Rab, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   24-04-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in

                   connection with Charpokhari P.S. Case No. 209 of 2025 in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under Sections 80(2)/ 3(5) of

                   the BNS Act.

                                 3. As per the prosecution case, all the accused persons

                   including this petitioner, killed the informant’s daughter due to

                   non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

                                 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits, at the

                   outset that the petitioner is the mother-in-law, who is a 65 years

                   old lady and has no concern with the day-to-day affairs of the

                   deceased and her husband. It is further submitted that the death

                   had taken place on account of asphyxia due to hanging, which

                   would be evident from the postmortem report which has been

                   annexed with the supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25906 of 2026(2) dt.24-04-2026
                                                         2/2




                       petitioner. It is further submitted that the husband of the deceased,

                       who is primary responsible for the welfare of his wife, has already

                       surrendered on 18.11.2025 and since then, he is in custody.

                                    5.    Learned APP for the State has opposed the

                       application for anticipatory bail.

                                    6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances

                       and also considering the fact that the petitioner is the mother-in-

                       law of the deceased and husband of the deceased is already in

                       custody, let the above named petitioner, in the event of her arrest

                       or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four

                       weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of

                       Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

                       amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where

                       the case is pending/successor court in connection with

                       Charpokhari P.S. Case No. 209 of 2025, subject to the condition as

                       laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the

                       B.N.S.S.



                                                 (Soni Shrivastava, J)
priyanka/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.