Patna High Court
Md. AkinversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- SANDEEP KUMAR
Holding
Bail was denied to the petitioner.
Summary
The petitioner, Md. Akin, was arrested in connection with a robbery (Section 392 IPC) involving a loot of Rs. 2,90,000. He claims he has been falsely implicated, has no prior criminal record, and has been in custody since 21‑12‑2025, offering to cooperate with the investigation. The prosecution opposes bail, citing forensic evidence (SDR, CDR) and alleged communication with co‑accused. The court considered these submissions and, despite another accused being granted bail by a coordinate bench, found the circumstances sufficient to deny bail. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Section 392 IPC given the alleged involvement and evidentiary material presented by the prosecution.
Legislation cited
- Indian Penal Code — s. 392
Subjects
- bail
- robbery
- Section 392 IPC
- false implication
- criminal antecedent
- bail denial
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25936 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-299 Year-2023 Thana- KURSAKANTA District- Araria
======================================================
Md. Akin S/o Md. Kamal Resident of Village- Ramjani, ward number- 06,
P.S.- Jankinagar, District- Purnia
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Gopal Kumar Jha, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rajendra Singh, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 20-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with
Kursakanta (Sonamani Godam) P.S. Case No. 299/2023
registered for the offences punishable under Section 392 of
I.P.C.
3. As per the prosecution case, unknown criminals
committed loot of Rs. 2,90,000/- from the informant and the
name of the petitioner has come during investigation.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case. Learned
counsel further submits that he has no criminal antecedent and
he is in custody since 21.12.2025. The petitioner undertakes to
co-operate in the case/ trial.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25936 of 2026(2) dt.20-04-2026
2/2
5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer
for regular bail of the petitioner and submitted that on the basis
of S.D.R., C.D.R. and tower location, the petitioner was found
talking to other accused persons.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to
grant bail to the petitioner despite the fact that the other accused
person has been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this
Court.
7. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
tusharika/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.